Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220307030417.22974-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
 <87h78a178u.wl-maz@kernel.org> <a31431bf-24bb-71ac-8f3c-f9ca19f5c4f0@linux.alibaba.com>
 <87bkyi0x53.wl-maz@kernel.org> <1b94af8b-a294-5765-4e1e-896f70db621f@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <1b94af8b-a294-5765-4e1e-896f70db621f@arm.com>
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 20:30:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3zA25=iZkVGPc=V+9tqqsWgQjoD9BSS60foGZtDwsujA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64: improve display about CPU architecture in cpuinfo
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Rongwei Wang <rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, joey.gouly@arm.com,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 5:48 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:

> And arguably it's not even too late, because 10 years ago this *did* say
> "AArch64". I don't remember all the exact details behind commit
> 44b82b7700d0 ("arm64: Fix up /proc/cpuinfo") - this just tickled enough
> of a memory to go and look up the git history - but I don't think we
> changed any of those fields without a real reason.
>

The patch description does state that this was done for compatibility with
32-bit architectures, which does make some sense. I suppose for similar
reasons, the arch/arm/ version of /proc/cpuinfo is now stuck at
'CPU architecture: 7', even for ARMv8 or higher in aarch32 mode.

The part that I find more annoying is how we leave out the one bit
of information that people are generally looking for in /proc/cpuinfo:
the name of the processor. Even though we already know the
exact processor type in order to handle the CPU errata, this is
always "model name\t: ARMv7 Processor rev %d (v7l)" on 32-bit,
and "model name\t: ARMv8 Processor rev %d (%s)" on 64-bit,
with the revision being the least important bit of information here...

        Arnd