Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:52:19 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/184] 5.16.13-rc2 review
Message-ID: <20220308185219.GA3686655@roeck-us.net>
References: <20220307162147.440035361@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220307162147.440035361@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:28:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.13 release.
> There are 184 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Mar 2022 16:21:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Your cycles are getting too short for my test system to provide results
in time. It gets overwhelmed, especially when there are updates affecting
all stable branches which trigger a complete rebuild of all those branches.

I see you published the current set of releases already, so I won't bother
sending test feedback this time around.

Guenter