Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
        Florian Meier <florian.meier@koalo.de>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>,
        Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220308013949.20323-1-linmq006@gmail.com>
References: <582c39ac-3099-d54f-5de3-d54a4ace0a04@microchip.com> <20220308013949.20323-1-linmq006@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: atmel: Fix error handling in snd_proto_probe
Message-Id: <164676005819.54315.3431589094288420530.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 08 Mar 2022 17:20:58 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 01:39:48 +0000, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> The device_node pointer is returned by of_parse_phandle()  with refcount
> incremented. We should use of_node_put() on it when done.
> 
> This function only calls of_node_put() in the regular path.
> And it will cause refcount leak in error paths.
> Fix this by calling of_node_put() in error handling too.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: atmel: Fix error handling in snd_proto_probe
      commit: b0bfaf0544d08d093d6211d7ef8816fb0b5b6c75

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark