Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Message-ID: <d9c0cdc7-9650-d9e3-e872-4bf22f0c4baa@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:04:42 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] drm/virtio: Add memory shrinker
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
To:     David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
        Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>,
        Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
        Gert Wollny <gert.wollny@collabora.com>
Cc:     Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
References: <20220308131725.60607-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
 <20220308131725.60607-6-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220308131725.60607-6-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 3/8/22 16:17, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> @@ -246,20 +246,28 @@ static int virtio_gpu_plane_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
>  	struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev = dev->dev_private;
>  	struct virtio_gpu_framebuffer *vgfb;
>  	struct virtio_gpu_object *bo;
> +	int err;
>  
>  	if (!new_state->fb)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	vgfb = to_virtio_gpu_framebuffer(new_state->fb);
>  	bo = gem_to_virtio_gpu_obj(vgfb->base.obj[0]);
> -	if (!bo || (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY && !bo->guest_blob))
> +
> +	err = virtio_gpu_gem_pin(bo);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;

I just noticed that this produces a refcount debug warning because I
missed to initialize the refcount when BO is created. That warning splat
was hidden by a huge lockdep splat produced by
drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(), which probably
should be fixed. I'll correct it in v2.