Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Message-ID: <c494fa10-e973-c137-b637-66bde327611c@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:00:35 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename
 args to unwind()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
        ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
        sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
        jmorris@namei.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <95691cae4f4504f33d0fc9075541b1e7deefe96f>
 <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20220117145608.6781-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
 <YgutJKqYe8ss8LLd@FVFF77S0Q05N>
 <845e4589-97d9-5371-3a0e-f6e05919f32d@linux.microsoft.com>
 <YiY6hecX0pVWowQ7@sirena.org.uk>
From:   "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <YiY6hecX0pVWowQ7@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 3/7/22 11:01, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:51:38AM -0600, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
>> Hey Mark Rutland, Mark Brown,
>>
>> Could you please review the rest of the patches in the series when you can?
>>
> 
> Please don't send content free pings.  As far as I remember I'd reviewed
> or was expecting changes based on review or dependent patches for
> everything that you'd sent.
> 

Indeed you did! Many thanks!

It is just that patch 11 that defines "select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE" did not receive any comments from you (unless I missed a comment that came from you. That is entirely possible. If I missed it, my bad). Since you suggested that change, I just wanted to make sure that that patch looks OK to you.

>> Also, many of the patches have received a Reviewed-By from you both. So, after I send the next version out, can we upstream those ones?
> 
> That's more a question for Catalin and Will.  If myself and Mark have
> reviewed patches then we're saying we think those patches are good to
> go.

Got it!

Thanks!

Madhavan