Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:49:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:49:23 -0500 Received: from AGrenoble-101-1-5-3.abo.wanadoo.fr ([80.11.136.3]:10886 "EHLO strider.virtualdomain.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:49:04 -0500 Message-ID: <3C024933.3090408@wanadoo.fr> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:52:51 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Cami User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012 X-Accept-Language: en-us, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ward Vandewege Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oops in kernel 2.4.x with x>=12 In-Reply-To: <20011126145505.A3783@countzero.vandewege.net> <3C023E74.8090303@wanadoo.fr> <20011126154626.A4119@countzero.vandewege.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ward Vandewege wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:07:00PM +0100, Fran?ois Cami wrote: > >>Maybe that will sound funny but... Could you try >>compiling the kernel for an i386 processor and >>report the results ? >> > > I've compiled 2.4.16-pre1 optimized for i386 instead of Athlon/Duron, and had no problem whatsoever booting. I'm now beating it a bit, compiling a kernel etc, but it appears to be rock solid. > > This seems to suggest there is a problem in the Athlon/Duron optimization code. As I thought. > Thanks Fran?ois! You're welcome. Fran?ois - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/