Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <416e0757-46fe-b290-cb8b-cd766f9cbdb6@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:34:58 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename
 args to unwind()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
        ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
        sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
        jmorris@namei.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <95691cae4f4504f33d0fc9075541b1e7deefe96f>
 <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20220117145608.6781-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
 <YgutJKqYe8ss8LLd@FVFF77S0Q05N>
 <845e4589-97d9-5371-3a0e-f6e05919f32d@linux.microsoft.com>
 <YiY6hecX0pVWowQ7@sirena.org.uk>
 <c494fa10-e973-c137-b637-66bde327611c@linux.microsoft.com>
 <YiiT2lFuxc3ob+Zq@sirena.org.uk>
From:   "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <YiiT2lFuxc3ob+Zq@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 3/9/22 05:47, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 04:00:35PM -0600, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
> 
>> It is just that patch 11 that defines "select
>> HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE" did not receive any comments from you
>> (unless I missed a comment that came from you. That is entirely
>> possible. If I missed it, my bad). Since you suggested that change, I
>> just wanted to make sure that that patch looks OK to you.
> 
> I think that's more a question for the livepatch people to be honest -
> it's not entirely a technical one, there's a bunch of confidence level
> stuff going on.  For example there was some suggestion that people might
> insist on having objtool support, though there's also substantial
> pushback on making objtool a requirement for anything from other
> quarters.  I was hoping that posting that patch would provoke some
> discussion about what exactly is needed but that's not happened thus
> far.

Understood. In that case, I will remove that patch because it is not really required for my current work on the unwinder. I will bring this up later in a different patch series where it will trigger a discussion.

Thanks.

Madhavan