Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp574540pxp; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:25:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJXFeAK9O3XClDZqsA564UezoxbNcNr+JiKrozjEZ3cpKXBwfEkH+u9BGYty6xDsfH8wBk X-Received: by 2002:a50:bac5:0:b0:416:4651:7782 with SMTP id x63-20020a50bac5000000b0041646517782mr206456ede.219.1646843130626; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:25:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646843130; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Hs9zQgVeh3zJhqLrsRrQEWgZmY/T+0ExEPJ3/a0oGnhPUHJhkiPM3oWiIOMnfttDMn fVD2plTtN5rqWIaRV5x6waJUa5Mxny91yX26YHIilTpkttOSMy8xnx1sskhx4xKThOfn +bIgkkDz4x52a/P1iNtbpYNmN2bNHCiroVxsVMgxosqUVYHMMbbudu/FQou80Q25pYpo b+D8qTt3SQq14827/QGCQLlN3Y41T8MkrVuLoo6cVpPYNGVLzSPlsZBMI+f6yfVHwIRK 4WrR3Yq0ZJ1VOFjh09zJu6qcggDL3MmNdmxOP2zGWYuCpHFUFEOg8+pzNbuwv5TENWvJ SQCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=CzEpjc0+yTW+nylbFfh6PQDE/H+wDk1u6Ed4/5NyyXw=; b=uhzmUXH6bfbo3cQsGqWIUTYnxqybMhuVWtCoGqjUwjCW3rg1aYshenG42P5CpxAPGP cyjZq072ipovgCxiZag3PuKqsEoBTxDAeETCxycdFE1DsZb0VJPcUjnds236dBpRCqFk BAvyVSY5vhKiiHEZ5msBHnOAM/HGugPD8EcrHjxxFuoIM7FQiPW6YYOTHy81EGMESJv7 zBpVucdvMeOVKA61cyqBqKZARnsk1/lcrsSkFLzBYZQkdaX8ComrzlYt+U5cmVVPzAJ2 93a0cRkDfxLfKHhb4GahfMg9vvJLpQ/HWttMFvo0LccPLv+vmo9BRPbP4QNkTy6M7ii/ T9uA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y10-20020a056402440a00b00415b3c87f2csi1878331eda.6.2022.03.09.08.25.07; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:25:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234017AbiCIPzI (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:55:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44872 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229825AbiCIPzF (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:55:05 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9718613AA21; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 07:54:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 022F86164F; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C25E1C340E8; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:54:03 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne , linux-kernel , linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti Subject: Re: Warning when exiting osnoise tracer Message-ID: <20220309105403.66d2b6ef@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:25:56 +0100 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > On 3/8/22 18:30, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > While running next-20220307, on a system with isolated CPUs (don't know if > > relevant but less tested code-path), I see this after killing (ctrl-C) the > > following trace command: > > > > trace-cmd record -e all -M 10 -p osnoise --poll > > > > Note that this is *without* my recent osnoise patch. > > yeah, your patch does not hit this part of the code. > > > [ 129.925474] ------------[ cut here ]------------ I'm surprised that my tests did not hit this. I've been running a lot of trace-cmd tests lately (to try and release 3.0!) and I have osnoise tracer enabled in these tests. Hmm, it's just a warning that doesn't appear to cause any damage. I just tried it out, and sure enough it triggered. The problem is that my trace-cmd tests do not check dmesg :-/ Maybe I need to change that, as I only looked at the result of the test, and because the tests spits out a lot of noise to dmesg, I can easily miss warnings there. I'll add a test to look for Call Traces at the end of the test. Thanks for the report. -- Steve