Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp583073pxp; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:34:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRDQztJ6Ui7obaykCg8BNzC+CFzY1iNB2Ngw8u3p03rG/0PvC/yyHlb20fpkOn1fQSKl7m X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4fc7:b0:6da:92b2:f572 with SMTP id i7-20020a1709064fc700b006da92b2f572mr566397ejw.184.1646843547478; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:32:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646843547; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zbd2jjH3osYBFVgzPD6ztsjtvI44V5dngggj67M0fdPo9F6cvh5c11OkfnKaXhfNy3 OPB+bpiZiWHbzzh7zRsxuoYaRCIGN8RECGYo8OMvH44zFRwlnVjMke9bJBIHjaDpZXy3 /XfVXNuyYrGzeez7bTZFGc9oAItI2gfWKNyS8sbFxPNzFB550YBHBbShp9Iy9z7yr/Wm zdmSI+RDGfoVbc0RuaBkTbuYWLAZLMaoTf4mg95/RBg4d4p0zLpqPjxDpovVSof6aMEX 1GrmMhbgE06wo7wKcIb7aFlxS/igtoAap9S/VUskStKkmiTHlIZNoeNED3xmTdFbZ5lp h1XQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=P0+Hq02w0KAKOmw9eZdnu5BxwH/vKw+2mzp/blkUTUQ=; b=In3T1xW/GOMh5Yz5EXXwEt3YdrJsdlF++CIZ6PvdAaQawlMln8hmYPMPfU9/vlzEEx XYt0Eb15T4y/WDsqXD0Vs782QOE8hsLGlnVyp4IRnEkAysbTxgAyy02ulnHyZis1TV+X M2Td+EEBNYKePGWoTu27bddcGd5gVnPOT3Z1MPobNLhaw52XU+DnppVHpbc1udcbmfAl +3FGhQ5ktL+6lCsKMzcjWnoemqertXvBCGmuf/6XcqY0nECgK06bxbZvhOLDs2d8OCjI fbxjh6eUWbz/WIU4OW6WfJdK5Lp90OWiQDpL3ggjeiYH012RO6GpcDD56AUIGubJjCDE oQDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=QtMjqcfz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fy1-20020a1709069f0100b006b293cd4ee3si1594229ejc.260.2022.03.09.08.31.45; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:32:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=QtMjqcfz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232929AbiCIQE3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:04:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40914 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234342AbiCIQDF (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:03:05 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A15C717585A; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:02:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 405806166E; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EF4AC340EF; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:02:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1646841725; bh=V0cfzmqwopV1PivZZMWmBcTS6Z2GRxflX2Jvc901+co=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QtMjqcfztVgO9E6m+Nf+7zwL11wkvqkZTgxIv20pJ/37+BC2nkUUJTgAzPOIEypp4 //ngT4UCYsaIQnTvzegQoy83nScJ1wLckt4kWZf4hHpVcDXP6aLRCYm7UHM7HrsSzp 75ymXbeqVCTvL0nEo2EcvNxi8rWTBLEVgnzX9RuU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Alyssa Milburn , Josh Poimboeuf , Borislav Petkov Subject: [PATCH 4.14 10/18] x86/speculation: Warn about eIBRS + LFENCE + Unprivileged eBPF + SMT Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:59:40 +0100 Message-Id: <20220309155856.398636349@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220309155856.090281301@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220309155856.090281301@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Josh Poimboeuf commit 0de05d056afdb00eca8c7bbb0c79a3438daf700c upstream. The commit 44a3918c8245 ("x86/speculation: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting") added a warning for the "eIBRS + unprivileged eBPF" combination, which has been shown to be vulnerable against Spectre v2 BHB-based attacks. However, there's no warning about the "eIBRS + LFENCE retpoline + unprivileged eBPF" combo. The LFENCE adds more protection by shortening the speculation window after a mispredicted branch. That makes an attack significantly more difficult, even with unprivileged eBPF. So at least for now the logic doesn't warn about that combination. But if you then add SMT into the mix, the SMT attack angle weakens the effectiveness of the LFENCE considerably. So extend the "eIBRS + unprivileged eBPF" warning to also include the "eIBRS + LFENCE + unprivileged eBPF + SMT" case. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Suggested-by: Alyssa Milburn Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -610,12 +610,27 @@ static inline const char *spectre_v2_mod #define SPECTRE_V2_LFENCE_MSG "WARNING: LFENCE mitigation is not recommended for this CPU, data leaks possible!\n" #define SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_EBPF_MSG "WARNING: Unprivileged eBPF is enabled with eIBRS on, data leaks possible via Spectre v2 BHB attacks!\n" +#define SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE_EBPF_SMT_MSG "WARNING: Unprivileged eBPF is enabled with eIBRS+LFENCE mitigation and SMT, data leaks possible via Spectre v2 BHB attacks!\n" #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL void unpriv_ebpf_notify(int new_state) { - if (spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS && !new_state) + if (new_state) + return; + + /* Unprivileged eBPF is enabled */ + + switch (spectre_v2_enabled) { + case SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS: pr_err(SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_EBPF_MSG); + break; + case SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE: + if (sched_smt_active()) + pr_err(SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE_EBPF_SMT_MSG); + break; + default: + break; + } } #endif @@ -1075,6 +1090,10 @@ void arch_smt_update(void) { mutex_lock(&spec_ctrl_mutex); + if (sched_smt_active() && unprivileged_ebpf_enabled() && + spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE) + pr_warn_once(SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE_EBPF_SMT_MSG); + switch (spectre_v2_user_stibp) { case SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE: break; @@ -1699,7 +1718,11 @@ static ssize_t spectre_v2_show_state(cha return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable: LFENCE\n"); if (spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS && unprivileged_ebpf_enabled()) - return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable: Unprivileged eBPF enabled\n"); + return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable: eIBRS with unprivileged eBPF\n"); + + if (sched_smt_active() && unprivileged_ebpf_enabled() && + spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE) + return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable: eIBRS+LFENCE with unprivileged eBPF and SMT\n"); return sprintf(buf, "%s%s%s%s%s%s\n", spectre_v2_strings[spectre_v2_enabled],