Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+G9fYtpy8VgK+ag6OsA9TDrwi5YGU4hu7GM8xwpO7v6LrCD4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <YiiDZ7jjG38gqP+Q@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <CAMj1kXHTdk1Abm7ShoZzrW6EpM9eyFMPSdaa58Ziie4ZMecCnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+G9fYvCvBBi+dZ+CnUy=ZK6GhCFhBw72_==Cav=Q8QP5T1r5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+G9fYt73AYs=z-BeZh22RBp==sf73pKky6m4iPSH7a4FssK7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMj1kXEFZVeWLaRQJmwO+Nn6uW4q6vXJOaNNTVKju1p2bMQksA@mail.gmail.com> <YijCkHHhpleeADAO@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <YijCkHHhpleeADAO@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 9 Mar 2022 22:08:25 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtjrAMg8TykZdRyZEfRthyqom_73x87F-60C_QFeEL8Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [next] arm: Internal error: Oops: 5 PC is at __read_once_word_nocheck
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Russell,

On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 20:37, Russell King (Oracle)
<linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 03:57:32PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 15:44, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
<trim>
> Well, we unwound until:
>
>  __irq_svc from migrate_disable+0x0/0x70
>
> and then crashed - and the key thing there is that we're at the start
> of migrate_disable() when we took an interrupt.
>
> For some reason, this triggers an access to address 0x10, which faults.
> We then try unwinding again, and successfully unwind all the way back
> to the same point (the line above) which then causes the unwinder to
> again access address 0x10, and the cycle repeats with the stack
> growing bigger and bigger.
>
> I'd suggest also testing without the revert but with my patch.

I have tested your patch on top of linux next-20220309 and still see kernel
crash as below [1]. build link [2].

[   26.812060] 8<--- cut here ---
[   26.813459] Unhandled fault: page domain fault (0x01b) at 0xb6a3ab70
[   26.816139] [b6a3ab70] *pgd=fb28a835
[   26.817770] Internal error: : 1b [#1] SMP ARM
[   26.819636] Modules linked in:
[   26.820956] CPU: 0 PID: 211 Comm: haveged Not tainted
5.17.0-rc7-next-20220309 #1
[   26.824519] Hardware name: Generic DT based system
[   26.827148] PC is at __read_once_word_nocheck+0x0/0x8
[   26.829856] LR is at unwind_frame+0x7dc/0xab4

- Naresh

[1] https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/4688599#L596
[2] https://builds.tuxbuild.com/269gYLGuAdmltuLhIUDAjS2fg1Q/