Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp832734pxp; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:42:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdtDYNRs8+AjHkE5j35+B22D9X4md+sicYupdnQwunwFU3ac8cypruzvWfhzhhX1agqlmi X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f155:b0:151:8377:9a8e with SMTP id d21-20020a170902f15500b0015183779a8emr1808556plb.21.1646862179029; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 13:42:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646862179; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q9rbgBp4AIAYDivbR161PvZSDcxuOAn6WCj1gY1fvPBSCEgDlonoQT1x6KwrpXD7h7 4peJcEhxKbPCiOrXHQ/isZZQJMKVapchtOfLFVTbVpqZ8UQ2B+WJhquOB7EpFk+xdWcI 5Ac7IzvyoCs5aGggUcgw8HkwiFitcngQ3rixJoGKTpsjK+AOorCsbchYjCETROp6ichh mYSFQzW8pYfHLCg3sioqZw3xmyNyY4n2bZARUx2EiLoYGOgm6HxLWZw3aLHyU3RUF8uA GPLBODi5Wp02+DxMcbyUa8lQZQDHYKELvCFhnefy9nJyc66TAfG5iX5/7NTRgRv1x0Rk nqpQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=12MTmTpu13hq53lEoH6MFWeYg7xR2/fBkzr+0Z6u0Ck=; b=Los7dfMaeLBudpzvXfOtQSsjFoCObM01A4ARmWZ/tVbX0KKy/QC7K5ejE5Wk3v/r0m hq2YRqsTVt53LNMusM24F3PaOGvAPvsPq9AzFGPWlNe3viL9C/MVuNsUaU6lxDvXzUkU ICbZGd4Y0YWqW8p8+0iGnTcPeII7+EnWzcZGHHG/TqPdKtLKKgAv1hYNLC8OYr7/p4iE R4DPtlsUSIQ33yK2EwYo2hawqsmgl9zAZLTJgVjOWTEvYJJB3IFvQ2169ZIBDteq9+kI nQDiWAjyJAbhW8+tbDdjbsyPRsPLcyBg/Ft7rF3P8mmiNrVwsilsbtT/JNGUfk8q8IcC GG3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=MRRIsrlb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c1-20020a170902d48100b00151dd6041a6si3360574plg.59.2022.03.09.13.42.41; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 13:42:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=MRRIsrlb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235535AbiCISfe (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:35:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53720 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230427AbiCISfc (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:35:32 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC57125518 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:34:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id d17so3051976pfv.6 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 10:34:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=12MTmTpu13hq53lEoH6MFWeYg7xR2/fBkzr+0Z6u0Ck=; b=MRRIsrlb2tD1c03r1HRBl9H3yV2f6E76atCl9PpgIr+Y1r8mp8mEEz3g6AjnN0F/AB Riqw5V8wHiW0NirwZWoSeYLXhojIBGQceu/lx7Dy2Hxr+1RJUihoh0a8Tm6gHHTdj7OJ UAlf0bjJIMErj04+OidGI99baw9exx5hBg3kKm2hhQOJ9bBEA9p8gZowZeZOZqTMyZHW NExOBYafwY7M/GnHpOE1vm6V3TracFbCMj24rDko7OyJfM0JBrukvNRzwFPziGnwht8/ +jBrE2BRn+YBlHlf8l9xRD5om2A6tgGqCzzl+7tWAOAmzW+trkose8cdfzWG0BDp2g4W YiVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=12MTmTpu13hq53lEoH6MFWeYg7xR2/fBkzr+0Z6u0Ck=; b=oLFhz9p15rn4SJJjvrpeZFl4Hq/d45S/5JL9gEqDlV4Ux04ZvCJoGFWM50IrE/VwQ3 bO+nqDgbml1Yds6Nbzp2IV3ETtfzSJKESHp4TGrYtIzqv2k3+SAngM07nuHupg1sAL+q MVUxv3vHYri9IfO59DDa0HtaYFwuf6Q9QOlDjeaPfSDxKDIcWkwPVx0so+ulx4ybZOk5 9DljowCvQJUzLE3nMQcI83mF7aWi8iB5mFeG8B1zx3/DhSUaIyAC9D2SjoYnWgT8IPS8 hoDaJZuNme0/eIh9O4NJyjc+z7hXN4WeKgvAiDXWbAtNKQqrbD3T6GxjIG1B9zRhDi8Z 2ISA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fFtrFUrtolf9PnTntwky2t7/ZOd+7J+t5k3hYMV2Q3fb6jDE3 oRnqIuahX6cY2dyMoZ+bPuPnYDbGBPw7KW3z8nr3NA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a02:283:b0:342:703e:1434 with SMTP id bk3-20020a056a02028300b00342703e1434mr897536pgb.74.1646850872623; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 10:34:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <164610292916.2682974.12924748003366352335.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <164610294030.2682974.642590821548098371.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20220309181843.000003fe@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20220309181843.000003fe@Huawei.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:34:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] cxl/core: Refactor a cxl_lock_class() out of cxl_nested_lock() To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Greg KH , Rafael J Wysocki , Alison Schofield , Vishal Verma , Ira Weiny , Ben Widawsky , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Linux NVDIMM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 10:19 AM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:49:00 -0800 > Dan Williams wrote: > > > In preparation for upleveling device_lock() lockdep annotation support into > > the core, provide a helper to retrieve the lock class. This lock_class > > will be used with device_set_lock_class() to idenify the CXL nested > > idenify? Indeed. > > > locking rules. > > > > Cc: Alison Schofield > > Cc: Vishal Verma > > Cc: Ira Weiny > > Cc: Ben Widawsky > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams > > Otherwise looks fine to me. > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Thanks!