Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp1195644pxp; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:08:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbRAAbSvpy1V0MCfJK/+A7GiTJI7osmqqiYvW3GvSEt+V60alMSRc3evx6VObxZeu+3EQ/ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1705:b0:4e1:5a1:c626 with SMTP id h5-20020a056a00170500b004e105a1c626mr3550755pfc.1.1646899738454; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:08:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646899738; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BHAbC8tXT64LFWgSayKNTTvzFlPb7BBczmYm76bhS4n7p0FnUlhGRkq7+RaL5OzMKZ o9+7N+CEtjazhzyTZttk3svmwhyg/mI1d71KCjSVQQsjFSYqnXbee30wxZvUZT7HfNRa UTa7m0N2Q+lnfnZwM31wo8qZ2DPBSDYDg4os8pA4h8zvdqNwuXWcfINMIw42CbhRmRpR BqzAOkZr2yPr/YFD8B3v9l9pyAjA/VG+NJS8eIGqDcZ9mfegIoMxrN535uz9fDFyjXMd gROhA0cnav7Q2SXxjJ8uAFNbnBOmfB61gC3R2oa/yi7O9/5gXnkIVivEEM+/LzU4SPxB P7uA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to :date:references:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=S+WZ4pumom6ULQAGUaSM8ow0u2M96p0Nw+pdeeGf4sg=; b=q8gLOdUfhm1pB61xgMV3U9g005J5xhMJd31V3FiBPGNJc1C5wJ1aaSymtsNnjQ43M3 6g04xen+NbKjqHxrKDaN57uIMexM+LsWAloBzV7Z15YNFfoVjWvqbvLqdGynBfRkmYim DKpCfRjhlohkX6mC8ai2sXBLLYX6KTXltPf9PZ+857lC81CEjmb9dOr+yWLD5HKPG6nV j9erKJd+4JrVaZIeI0GjSReF0BvVmR951Z2Y3ZclKY2c3vIB8cHiOoMrY0dHoOEbUttF 7hBvtFEOljPPO2jx213i+3qZAQ+rXF2kEjc7pS/EmKGhkr7gtTW5j10TPsvUizlHkG82 DLag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=KCbAbYfC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g70-20020a636b49000000b00380a6017035si4014766pgc.713.2022.03.10.00.08.40; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:08:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=KCbAbYfC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238607AbiCJAk6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:40:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55158 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233452AbiCJAk5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:40:57 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 075ED124C1F for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:39:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1646872797; x=1678408797; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to: message-id:mime-version; bh=X2z+zSN/i5yI6VGeE+HYqJx2M+Kg5IqbBL0UPebJfPU=; b=KCbAbYfCA+11YRaJYwuzHkU2X99b3qn+eU/6yv7q3YQom6yVWfyix0Fr T5Vbh83hNXNGXzCHhBQH3eoW0Pyyf7H028L5ZtMvqJl8DIp8bhhyx1BNI B+VYctEIGD9eiBRyAMru6NnWEc2IRaALF390TUpQ1/OXCUzd/bw14KYZ+ AKG93NVzHtiyvCdbtwcCtJzOjGTjwrYy7DohMl+maN1TrRKjkuJF5R9pr UGYd+c21f4NBsG7ZCplfzZbbRm2/wRcInZZCUHPO5tcDicb8/NEotGwEH 7nTiHYh6lAkzegmfh0mtcga+iqvTLqZmnav2qfaF9bnvd4ETS2R1YfJl8 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10281"; a="341554244" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,169,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="341554244" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2022 16:39:57 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,169,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="513758433" Received: from yhuang6-desk2.sh.intel.com (HELO yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com) ([10.239.13.94]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2022 16:39:55 -0800 From: "Huang, Ying" To: Oscar Salvador Cc: Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Abhishek Goel , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Only re-generate demotion targets when a numa node changes its N_CPU state References: <20220309144644.4278-1-osalvador@suse.de> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 08:39:53 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20220309144644.4278-1-osalvador@suse.de> (Oscar Salvador's message of "Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:46:44 +0100") Message-ID: <87bkyefxnq.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oscar Salvador writes: > Abhishek reported that after patch [1], hotplug operations are > taking ~double the expected time. [2] > > The reason behind is that the CPU callbacks that migrate_on_reclaim_init() > sets always call set_migration_target_nodes() whenever a CPU is brought > up/down. > But we only care about numa nodes going from having cpus to become > cpuless, and vice versa, as that influences the demotion_target order. > > We do already have two CPU callbacks (vmstat_cpu_online() and vmstat_cpu_dead()) > that check exactly that, so get rid of the CPU callbacks in > migrate_on_reclaim_init() and only call set_migration_target_nodes() from > vmstat_cpu_{dead,online}() whenever a numa node change its N_CPU state. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210721063926.3024591-2-ying.huang@intel.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/eb438ddd-2919-73d4-bd9f-b7eecdd9577a@linux.vnet.ibm.com/ > > Reported-by: Abhishek Goel > Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador > --- > I think there is further room for improvement like should we call in to > set_migration_target_nodes() when demotion is disabled via sysctl? > I will have a look into that, but let us go with this quick fix for now. > Also, I am not really strong about the Fixes tag, but it can be added > if you think it makes sense. > --- > include/linux/migrate.h | 5 +++++ > mm/migrate.c | 36 +----------------------------------- > mm/vmstat.c | 10 +++++++++- > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h > index db96e10eb8da..c64fe2923fb0 100644 > --- a/include/linux/migrate.h > +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h > @@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, > struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio, int extra_count); > > extern bool numa_demotion_enabled; > +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU > +extern void set_migration_target_nodes(void); > +#else > +static inline void set_migration_target_nodes() {} > +#endif > #else > > static inline void putback_movable_pages(struct list_head *l) {} > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c > index c7da064b4781..7847e4de01d7 100644 > --- a/mm/migrate.c > +++ b/mm/migrate.c > @@ -3190,7 +3190,7 @@ static void __set_migration_target_nodes(void) > /* > * For callers that do not hold get_online_mems() already. > */ > -static void set_migration_target_nodes(void) > +void set_migration_target_nodes(void) > { > get_online_mems(); > __set_migration_target_nodes(); > @@ -3254,47 +3254,13 @@ static int __meminit migrate_on_reclaim_callback(struct notifier_block *self, > return notifier_from_errno(0); > } > > -/* > - * React to hotplug events that might affect the migration targets > - * like events that online or offline NUMA nodes. > - * > - * The ordering is also currently dependent on which nodes have > - * CPUs. That means we need CPU on/offline notification too. > - */ > -static int migration_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu) > -{ > - set_migration_target_nodes(); > - return 0; > -} > - > -static int migration_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu) > -{ > - set_migration_target_nodes(); > - return 0; > -} > - > static int __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void) > { > - int ret; > - > node_demotion = kmalloc_array(nr_node_ids, > sizeof(struct demotion_nodes), > GFP_KERNEL); > WARN_ON(!node_demotion); > > - ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_MM_DEMOTION_DEAD, "mm/demotion:offline", > - NULL, migration_offline_cpu); > - /* > - * In the unlikely case that this fails, the automatic > - * migration targets may become suboptimal for nodes > - * where N_CPU changes. With such a small impact in a > - * rare case, do not bother trying to do anything special. > - */ > - WARN_ON(ret < 0); > - ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_MM_DEMOTION_ONLINE, "mm/demotion:online", > - migration_online_cpu, NULL); > - WARN_ON(ret < 0); > - We need to call set_migration_target_nodes() during system boot somewhere, either here or in init_mm_internals(). Best Regards, Huang, Ying > hotplug_memory_notifier(migrate_on_reclaim_callback, 100); > return 0; > } > diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c > index 4057372745d0..0529a83c8f89 100644 > --- a/mm/vmstat.c > +++ b/mm/vmstat.c > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include "internal.h" > > @@ -2043,7 +2044,12 @@ static void __init init_cpu_node_state(void) > static int vmstat_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu) > { > refresh_zone_stat_thresholds(); > - node_set_state(cpu_to_node(cpu), N_CPU); > + > + if (!node_state(cpu_to_node(cpu), N_CPU)) { > + node_set_state(cpu_to_node(cpu), N_CPU); > + set_migration_target_nodes(); > + } > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -2066,6 +2072,8 @@ static int vmstat_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu) > return 0; > > node_clear_state(node, N_CPU); > + set_migration_target_nodes(); > + > return 0; > }