Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423116AbXBUVBn (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:01:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423117AbXBUVBn (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:01:43 -0500 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.249]:55460 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423116AbXBUVBm (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:01:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eFZ74L+wslDMJ6yZtLci6+B+sELiIKjfDuUF0O8EbHOP8p76eyoL428lw4oqTSgdPb2kznfKcvVqYWYvCzXhmOfQARKLHd35NdV6YeC2Gu+upUSAbxaLGjp+fiz24Yj0jjaLWZxG9fUMmThLsqnwfT84Lh4XGdSHpO4abCm1thQ= Message-ID: <8d158e1f0702211301n3d30f590t14b1501e418da7e0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:01:40 +0100 From: "Patrick Ale" To: "Vincent Legoll" Subject: Re: libsata doesn't like bus without master Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4727185d0702211247r796a2f4fte8b9511aa6864452@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4727185d0702211241v63549a77ye1023e9ff802c24a@mail.gmail.com> <4727185d0702211247r796a2f4fte8b9511aa6864452@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1564 Lines: 41 On 2/21/07, Vincent Legoll wrote: > Argh I think I screwed the mail threading, I was refering to: > > http://ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0702.1/1060.html > > From: Patrick Ale > Date: Sun Feb 11 2007 - 05:28:21 EST > > Sorry Yea, I know.. I mail too much.. too much time at hands and all ;-) But serious, The second "abnormal" error "ATA: abnormal status 0x8 on port 0xF88597DF", I got feedback from, by Tejun. He confirmed that, as I thought, this was a cosmectic error messages for "No devices found". The first one got some debate as if it was legal to have a slave without a master and all and the last thing I saw written on this email that we (that is, the linux developers and the maintainers, I dont code anything other than 'Hello world' and even that might segfault) should support it and if we dont yet, fix it. Question for you tho, since I have two laptops with the same chipset and more ore less same configuration (Siemens LifeBook E series with the same DVD writer and an HP laptop), do you use native SATA mode? or Legacy/Compatible mode? In the latter case it might explain why you see one master connected to one bus and a slave to the other. If you use legacy SATA mode you should just see drive 0 and drive 1. At least, that's how it works here :) Patrick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/