Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:23:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:22:52 -0500 Received: from cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.152.185]:4742 "EHLO opus.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:22:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:22:44 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: war Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PPC Question Message-ID: <20011126082244.D1132@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> In-Reply-To: <3C0259B4.86124AE1@starband.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C0259B4.86124AE1@starband.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:03:16AM -0500, war wrote: > I don't mind trying to compile release kernels on a PPC box, however > when I send a bug report to LKML, everyone shoots it down and tells me > to use someone else's source tree. ...just like every other arch, except x86. > If people do not care about PPC in the kernel, should it be included in > the source, or should I just forget about trying to use the 'stock' > kernel and use someone else's PPC source tree (which are usually a few > versions behind) in order to compile the kernel? No, you should use the PPC community trees which all of the PPC maintainers use and is at worst a day behind kernel.org (But usually just a few hours...). http://penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/