Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp2070508pxp; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 19:04:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyclPp/VvqqgLCZGhSWV0aD8FJ52vdFXPo+06fVFvCojb9cn8XcKKBdrJ8nJllODlqEoszv X-Received: by 2002:aca:37d5:0:b0:2c9:7643:5e89 with SMTP id e204-20020aca37d5000000b002c976435e89mr11376357oia.116.1646967870770; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 19:04:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646967870; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oa5066iyKh1obEDusg4znJRBB+drQyH9X+mWunzvemcV3xvAynNib4Yeu3cxNA56BT zoHjIYO78usiP70W7V7X0KzALtnesz0SHazEkV+dQ4K+E+S+YBs2IeICQwVnq9I1HZdi 9yP+rksVlg/kjDw/HmBrU5AaMUQXbjfMpjp7uMve3wQn0c8kjadOZmY2GohcdDUjdwRF qFeiTfXk6zAswbv7KVa3Hqrc6jZgBuVX1zaE5G0FIPsGLWot6N26lmn1o9BtE6vhlVOP j2u9Tr2hYbJBJrIg2WxZkR3tAv/IMQLtJd3aw0Nxl/0YVO21hXgc9zMwmACn8s3UWmlB Mb1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=dt5RYgCzfKdgTXGuJeXWXzZ5xLmq7pRkplQbrCDRItM=; b=09tWdVOdKljHS0FrG/ur+s/rvJKmr0ivVdE1quWVNEVmS2L9GvFaBhwBbrL/rCMV+A gyAao5e8+NAhESJysTwXvR5vtfviwGd5Ab026mTtoHTFceGdUkfQG8HM4QUOVBfQGHjR 1AGzwtRyv176v+PQ5mvpamRIb+4jLxElHx23trbU+VrH/AMv6XHhvSJqivhf2mBhLvqZ i8C6s/HBGP6l6D5CjmC30m+Gw/mXbzj/vjXiomAInZTG1w6WHp98ywMC+lAfiY3lU/f3 nyzmrAl3eEKzX3K+1gMf8sOrX7pISlyket43+eWFphfTFItlLZ3rqVyS1y5LifPAASgf RNMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=J6PmhMsl; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p14-20020a056830304e00b005b22c31604dsi5280808otr.318.2022.03.10.19.04.16; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 19:04:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=J6PmhMsl; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241400AbiCJOrc (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:47:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38640 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244576AbiCJOda (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:33:30 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCCF5EBAF5; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 06:31:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CD24B82681; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D63C7C340EB; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:31:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1646922665; bh=sCcnUuF8FK5ROo5bLztXlk70IFYHouVroVyN4ACPzSI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=J6PmhMslSSTC3e85eeINyOjXyc2+r6jq+e5nf5oF/nPZCaNSiJyDsJarWqH1kECh6 PCgHejDQTG6rkOtsusnxXHlMIcwyNxUfUJmmix35JOww23cIUHOiJ8lZnfjunPLQdy 1qE0OV5hNyslk36UeHcY13d+8u3Ez+Ap+A5rguSk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Alyssa Milburn , Josh Poimboeuf , Borislav Petkov Subject: [PATCH 5.15 10/58] x86/speculation: Warn about eIBRS + LFENCE + Unprivileged eBPF + SMT Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:18:59 +0100 Message-Id: <20220310140813.281755442@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220310140812.983088611@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220310140812.983088611@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Josh Poimboeuf commit 0de05d056afdb00eca8c7bbb0c79a3438daf700c upstream. The commit 44a3918c8245 ("x86/speculation: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting") added a warning for the "eIBRS + unprivileged eBPF" combination, which has been shown to be vulnerable against Spectre v2 BHB-based attacks. However, there's no warning about the "eIBRS + LFENCE retpoline + unprivileged eBPF" combo. The LFENCE adds more protection by shortening the speculation window after a mispredicted branch. That makes an attack significantly more difficult, even with unprivileged eBPF. So at least for now the logic doesn't warn about that combination. But if you then add SMT into the mix, the SMT attack angle weakens the effectiveness of the LFENCE considerably. So extend the "eIBRS + unprivileged eBPF" warning to also include the "eIBRS + LFENCE + unprivileged eBPF + SMT" case. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Suggested-by: Alyssa Milburn Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -653,12 +653,27 @@ static inline const char *spectre_v2_mod #define SPECTRE_V2_LFENCE_MSG "WARNING: LFENCE mitigation is not recommended for this CPU, data leaks possible!\n" #define SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_EBPF_MSG "WARNING: Unprivileged eBPF is enabled with eIBRS on, data leaks possible via Spectre v2 BHB attacks!\n" +#define SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE_EBPF_SMT_MSG "WARNING: Unprivileged eBPF is enabled with eIBRS+LFENCE mitigation and SMT, data leaks possible via Spectre v2 BHB attacks!\n" #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL void unpriv_ebpf_notify(int new_state) { - if (spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS && !new_state) + if (new_state) + return; + + /* Unprivileged eBPF is enabled */ + + switch (spectre_v2_enabled) { + case SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS: pr_err(SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_EBPF_MSG); + break; + case SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE: + if (sched_smt_active()) + pr_err(SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE_EBPF_SMT_MSG); + break; + default: + break; + } } #endif @@ -1118,6 +1133,10 @@ void cpu_bugs_smt_update(void) { mutex_lock(&spec_ctrl_mutex); + if (sched_smt_active() && unprivileged_ebpf_enabled() && + spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE) + pr_warn_once(SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE_EBPF_SMT_MSG); + switch (spectre_v2_user_stibp) { case SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE: break; @@ -1793,7 +1812,11 @@ static ssize_t spectre_v2_show_state(cha return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable: LFENCE\n"); if (spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS && unprivileged_ebpf_enabled()) - return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable: Unprivileged eBPF enabled\n"); + return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable: eIBRS with unprivileged eBPF\n"); + + if (sched_smt_active() && unprivileged_ebpf_enabled() && + spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE) + return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable: eIBRS+LFENCE with unprivileged eBPF and SMT\n"); return sprintf(buf, "%s%s%s%s%s%s\n", spectre_v2_strings[spectre_v2_enabled],