Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:26:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:26:12 -0500 Received: from mail0.epfl.ch ([128.178.50.57]:64783 "HELO mail0.epfl.ch") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:25:36 -0500 Message-ID: <3C025EED.2010300@epfl.ch> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:25:33 +0100 From: Nicolas Aspert Organization: LTS-DE-EPFL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Didier.Moens@dmb001.rug.ac.be CC: linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH]Re: [Fwd: Re: OOPS in agpgart (2.4.13, 2.4.15pre7)] In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nicolas Aspert wrote: > Hello again > > > Here is a patch that _might_ improve things wrt. agp support for i830 > chipsets. I do not have a i830 box at hand, so it has not been tested > (well, it compiles ok. ;-). If you feel like crashing your PC once more, > try the patch (against 2.4.15) and tell me whether things became > better/worse. > I assumed that the i830mg without secondary device was working in a way > that is similar to other Intel chipsets. > It seems that I made a (silly) confusion between i830M and i830MG. Anyway, take my previous patch and replace MG by M wherever it may be relevant, and it may do the trick. Anyway, I am not quite sure about the differences between those two versions.... (the Intel specs are not clear at all about this.) a+ -- Nicolas Aspert Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS) Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/