Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423259AbXBUWyx (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:54:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423268AbXBUWyx (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:54:53 -0500 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([147.32.192.36]:60423 "EHLO max.feld.cvut.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423259AbXBUWys convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:54:48 -0500 From: CIJOML To: "Dmitry Torokhov" Subject: Re: Phis in /proc/bus/input/devices same for all devices? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:54:38 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: "Marcel Holtmann" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200702212313.30359.cijoml@volny.cz> <1172097890.7403.52.camel@violet> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702212354.38618.cijoml@volny.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1727 Lines: 44 I need this for differing Option "XkbModel" in Xorg, so I can bind to each device it's model and has correct xev's scancodes based on model. So I prefer to have as Phis just only BDADDR, because for me this doesn't make sense to have there device to which keyboard connect. Then I should have 1 section for each receiver, which is stupid. Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Bluetooth Keyboard" Driver "kbd" Option "Name" "Bluetooth HID Boot Protocol Device" Option "Phis" "BDADDR" Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" Option "XkbModel" "dinovo" Option "XkbLayout" "us" EndSection and so on for every other BT keyboard I own. Michal Dne st?eda 21 ?nor 2007 23:48 Dmitry Torokhov napsal(a): > On 2/21/07, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > > > can anybody reply to this and share his/her opinion? > > > > > > Input core already exports uniq to udev and also via sysfs. > > > > so do you think it would be better to create phys as a string of the > > source and destination address like "-" for Bluetooth. And > > then keep the uniq empty like all USB devices without serial number do? > > I'd keep uniq as is and do what you proposed with phys. This way you > can either use uniq to identify your device while moving it from one > receiver to another (if you have several) or do exact match on phys to > get receiver/device pair. > > Does this make sense? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/