Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Fri, 11 Mar 2022 16:01:53 +0000
From:   Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
        hch@infradead.org, cl@linux.com, mbenes@suse.cz,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeyu@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
        void@manifault.com, atomlin@atomlin.com, allen.lkml@gmail.com,
        joe@perches.com, msuchanek@suse.de, oleksandr@natalenko.name,
        jason.wessel@windriver.com, pmladek@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdb: Remove redundant module related references
Message-ID: <20220311160153.3k2avq24mpjyrdpy@ava.usersys.com>
References: <20220307174741.2889588-1-atomlin@redhat.com>
 <20220308105203.2981099-1-atomlin@redhat.com>
 <20220309120640.uumh46n2l37jaddf@maple.lan>
 <YiporeSIrkFg/YS8@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <20220311154723.ezo3wvgg4puu2zk7@maple.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220311154723.ezo3wvgg4puu2zk7@maple.lan>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri 2022-03-11 15:47 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On the whole it doesn't really matter much... but landing the
> independent parts via the normal route for kgdb code reduces what I
> have to remember acking.

Hi Daniel,

Any thoughts on this [1]? Unfortunately, the wrong In-Reply-To was
specified. So sorry about that. I will send another iteration of the series
so that it'll be easier for Luis to apply to mcgrof/modules-testing or
mcgrof/modules-next but after we have more feedback.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220310102625.3441888-2-atomlin@redhat.com/


Kind regards,

-- 
Aaron Tomlin