Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:08:42 +0000
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/58] 5.15.28-rc2 review
Message-ID: <YisfqrlO5UnT934W@debian>
References: <20220310140812.983088611@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220310140812.983088611@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 03:18:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.28 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 12 Mar 2022 14:07:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 62 configs -> 3 failures
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 100 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 4 configs -> no failure

Mips build failures were reported earlier, and it needs:
e5b40668e93 ("slip: fix macro redefine warning")
b81e0c2372e ("block: drop unused includes in <linux/genhd.h>")

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/863
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/870
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/868

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip