Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1751371AbXBUXv1@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751371AbXBUXv1 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:51:27 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751373AbXBUXv1
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:51:27 -0500
Received: from warden-p.diginsite.com ([208.29.163.248]:62662 "HELO
	warden.diginsite.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with SMTP id S1751371AbXBUXv0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:51:26 -0500
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:34:11 -0800 (PST)
From: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
X-X-Sender: dlang@dlang.diginsite.com
To: "Michael K. Edwards" <medwards.linux@gmail.com>
cc: davids@webmaster.com, v j <vj.linux@gmail.com>, trent.waddington@gmail.com,
       "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
In-Reply-To: <f2b55d220702211408r7954d5dar2c59e1e679316811@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0702211527080.15723@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
References: <3d57814d0702191458l1021caeyaefd7775398c5f2a@mail.gmail.com> 
 <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKIEFNBLAC.davids@webmaster.com>
 <f2b55d220702211408r7954d5dar2c59e1e679316811@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1295
Lines: 27

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Michael K. Edwards wrote:

> But wait, you say -- the Evil Linker modified, copied, and distributed
> my POP server too!  That makes him subject to the terms of the GPL.
> And you're right; but to understand what that means, you're going to
> need to understand how a lawsuit for copyright infringement works.
> The very, very, very concise version is:

<argument snipped for brevity>

I understand why you say that the Evil Linker's program isn't covered by the 
GPL, but your argument makes it sound like the modified POP server doesn't need 
to have it's source released. This I don't understand, it contains the origional 
source code, so what right does Evil Linker have to distribute it (or a modified 
version).

you are comeing dangerously close to saying that the GPL is meaningless and 
putting something under it is the same as putting it under public domain. There 
is case law now that says that this isn't the case (although I agree that it's 
not nearly as broad as it's proponents would like it to be)

David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/