Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:35:42 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
Cc:     lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com,
        oder_chiou@realtek.com, robh@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ASoC: rt5659: Expose internal clock relationships
Message-ID: <YitQLsUAEHM7gXEG@sirena.org.uk>
References: <5c531e7c-58e4-2c55-57cb-85eff68b0927@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8wZvnWaTLkzb2sYl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5c531e7c-58e4-2c55-57cb-85eff68b0927@nvidia.com>
Precedence: bulk


--8wZvnWaTLkzb2sYl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 08:29:26PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:

> Yes, it would be required and I will include it in v2. In this series, I
> wanted to get some initial feedback if the idea is right.

It looks plausible.

--8wZvnWaTLkzb2sYl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmIrUC0ACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9CiCAf9E0eqTsp3uhv/jiRjqxZnSq6Jy4IVm/W/bCSx1hf9JQr7YPQOE1LAQF42
LTlskNZzOyyOPckwauOS4rLiD0mn5Ht8wsEi7PikMpYDa18l0h9j17MLxGCHTtrm
YAdUR1hcXhMGEXZeICyOc9lFL5+Y2pUEgxThXnRvo4VWCJwegyTm0rw05cAzVe+U
FPdXhB/R+TtcHbGB4a+cHbUs/PsmFyS/Tps0IQZXSzyB3hFEwlTFAs7/czml3HPO
x4cBwLRDFyIB+1OTaF6vyfH28gYyJYO8elFHKBbLKBS/m3Kf60Th04c7142gE939
YlkFwkK8LWMXUkwFQ1QAYaxhNuV9DQ==
=iCaa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8wZvnWaTLkzb2sYl--