Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211224161334.31123-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <20211224161334.31123-3-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <c5ea7235-8642-6a89-f4ce-bd0861b6e4aa@linaro.org> <CA+V-a8tkhERx+8zDae5aWkNQ9Oxd1AamRL=i4TDC2X8RGgAo0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <5e13c1ba-0bf5-e360-c350-e7a1a1402350@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <5e13c1ba-0bf5-e360-c350-e7a1a1402350@linaro.org>
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Mar 2022 08:14:48 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+CWKvkHMNhAa3o_rSLy_+AoHi6wkB3MRM8O3jJ5sG_Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slimbus: qcom-ngd-ctrl: Use platform_get_irq() to get the interrupt
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        alsa-devel <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 4:42 AM Srinivas Kandagatla
<srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/03/2022 10:23, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:16 AM Srinivas Kandagatla
> > <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 24/12/2021 16:13, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> >>> platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static
> >>> allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue
> >>
> >> Are you saying that we should not be using platform_get_resource(pdev,
> >> IORESOURCE_IRQ, ...) on drivers that support DT?

We should be using platform_get_irq(). (period, on all platform drivers)

> >>> when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property
> >>> in the node as this bypasses the hierarchical setup and messes up the
> >>> irq chaining.
> >>
> >> Should this not be fixed in the DT core itself?
> >>
> > Yes the plan is to fix in the DT core itself (refer [0]).
> >
> > [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20211209001056.29774-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
> >
> >>>
> >>> In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core
> >>> code use platform_get_irq().
> >>
> >> I would prefer this patch to be part of the series that removes IRQ
> >> resource handling from DT core.
> >>
> > Since there are too many users (which are in different subsystems)
> > getting this all in single series would be a pain. As a result it is
> > split up into individual subsystems.
> Am happy for this to be included in that series,
> TBH, this patch make more sense along with that series than by itself.

No it doesn't. This is no different than converting to devm_* variants
or other cleanups to match current preferred styles.

Treewide cross subsystem clean-ups are a huge pain to merge. Why would
you ask for that when it is clearly not necessary?

Rob