Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751511AbXBVIw0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:52:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751514AbXBVIw0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:52:26 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([217.147.92.249]:2283 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751511AbXBVIwZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:52:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:52:13 +0000 From: Russell King To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Jose Goncalves , Frederik Deweerdt , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Serial related oops Message-ID: <20070222085213.GA15841@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: "H. Peter Anvin" , Jose Goncalves , Frederik Deweerdt , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070219143520.GB27370@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070220144814.GJ566@slug> <20070219150508.GD27370@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45D9D073.7020701@inov.pt> <20070219164200.GF27370@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45D9E46C.4030408@inov.pt> <20070219212347.GA4258@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45DC537B.6020108@inov.pt> <20070221230503.GA28156@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45DD30DE.20503@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45DD30DE.20503@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1345 Lines: 39 On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 09:57:50PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Russell King wrote: > > > > >Plainly, %ebx changed across the call to serial_in() at c01c0f7b. > >First thing to notice is this violates the C code - "up" can not > >change. > > > >Now let's look at serial_in: > > > >c01bfa70: 55 push %ebp > >c01bfa71: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp > >c01bfa73: 53 push %ebx > >... > >c01bfab7: 5b pop %ebx > >c01bfab8: 5d pop %ebp > >c01bfab9: c3 ret > > > >This code tells the CPU to preserves %ebx and %ebp. But we know %ebx > >_wasn't_ preserved. Ergo, your CPU is plainly not doing what the code > >told it to do. > > > > ... assuming nothing else clobbered the stack slot (which would be a > compiler error, or a wild pointer.) > > Got a disassembly of the whole function? See Jose's subsequent message to the one I replied to. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/