Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281921AbRKZQ7K>; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:59:10 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281922AbRKZQ7A>; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:59:00 -0500
Received: from dialin-145-254-222-136.arcor-ip.net ([145.254.222.136]:1268
	"HELO duron.intern.kubla.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S281921AbRKZQ6t>; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:58:49 -0500
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:58:37 +0100
From: Dominik Kubla <kubla@sciobyte.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>,
        Martin Persson <martin@cendio.se>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.16-pre1
Message-ID: <20011126175837.B4524@duron.intern.kubla.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0111260616340.25678-100000@dlang.diginsite.com> <E168P2L-0005fW-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E168P2L-0005fW-00@the-village.bc.nu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
X-No-Archive: yes
Restrict: no-external-archive
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:55:17PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> Thats why vendor kernels are generally a good idea for production setups.
> Most vendors kernel trees have been beaten solidly for days with stress
> testing and coverage test tools before they get put out

Makes one wonder whether or not we need regression tests included
in the kernel...

Dominik Kubla
-- 
ScioByte GmbH    Zum Schiersteiner Grund 2     55127 Mainz (Germany)
Phone: +49 700 724 629 83                    Fax: +49 700 724 629 84
1024D/717F16BB    A384 F5F1 F566 5716 5485  27EF 3B00 C007 717F 16BB
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/