Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933026AbXBVLZt (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:25:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933027AbXBVLZt (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:25:49 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:54251 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933026AbXBVLZs (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:25:48 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:20:39 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Suparna Bhattacharya Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Arjan van de Ven , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , Ulrich Drepper , Zach Brown , Evgeniy Polyakov , "David S. Miller" , Davide Libenzi , Jens Axboe , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3 Message-ID: <20070222112039.GA13611@elte.hu> References: <20070221211355.GA7302@elte.hu> <20070222100126.GA24643@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070222100126.GA24643@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -5.3 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-5.3 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1407 Lines: 33 * Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > > Threadlets share much of the scheduling infrastructure with syslets. > > > > Syslets (small, kernel-side, scripted "syscall plugins") are still > > supported - they are (much...) harder to program than threadlets but > > they allow the highest performance. Core infrastructure libraries > > like glibc/libaio are expected to use syslets. Jens Axboe's FIO tool > > already includes support for v2 syslets, and the following patch > > updates FIO to > > Ah, glad to see that - I was wondering if it was worthwhile to try > adding syslet support to aio-stress to be able to perform some > comparisons. [...] i think it would definitely be worth it. > [...] Hopefully FIO should be able to generate a similar workload, but > I haven't tried it yet so am not sure. Are you planning to upload some > results (so I can compare it with patterns I am familiar with) ? i had no time yet to do careful benchmarks. Right now my impression from quick testing is that libaio performance can be exceeded via syslets. So it would be very interesting if you could try this too, independently of me. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/