Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220310220932.140973-1-jsd@semihalf.com> <Yiu2NIvEOow87s+r@ninjato>
In-Reply-To: <Yiu2NIvEOow87s+r@ninjato>
From:   =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIETEhWJyb8Wb?= <jsd@semihalf.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:56:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOtMz3OM9c7NpGiYVHxs+KOVBVNykbQkj+KarBbNtUt6iiiQCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] i2c: designware: Remove code duplication
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        upstream@semihalf.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi Wolfram,

pt., 11 mar 2022 o 21:51 Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> napisa=C5=82(a):
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:09:32PM +0100, Jan Dabros wrote:
> > Simplify code by moving common part to one function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
> > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
> Is it really based on for-next? I can't apply the patch. Am I missing
> something?

I checked this once again and I mistakenly used the old linux-next
baseline. Actually the cherry-pick of the above patch was successful,
but I confirmed "git am" is not happy because of the missing semicolon
in one of the lines from context. Baseline for v2 doesn't include
1e4fe5430b: "i2c: designware: remove unneeded semicolon" thus the
problem.

Sorry for the confusion, I will send v3 rebased on top of fresh -next.

Best Regards,
Jan