Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946010AbXBVOJr (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:09:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946013AbXBVOJq (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:09:46 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:38413 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946010AbXBVOJp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:09:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 10/13] KVM: Wire up hypercall handlers to a central arch-independent location From: Arjan van de Ven To: Avi Kivity Cc: Dor Laor , Pavel Machek , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <45DD9A9D.4060500@qumranet.com> References: <45D979D3.2020907@qumranet.com> <20070219103052.4D23725016B@il.qumranet.com><20070221103733.GI3945@ucw.cz> <45DD6CF0.3010509@qumranet.com> <64F9B87B6B770947A9F8391472E032160A91BAF3@ehost011-8.exch011.intermedia.net> <1172140490.3531.236.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <45DD7330.1030001@qumranet.com> <1172142081.3531.243.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <45DD94D3.4030102@qumranet.com> <1172149924.3531.260.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <45DD9A9D.4060500@qumranet.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:09:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1172153373.3531.268.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-3.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1075 Lines: 25 > Can't it be done by a helper function using a timer and a signal (or > whatever mechanism we use to wake up vcpus)? one could do that but it's not optimal; if the process DOES get waken up earlier, it should take the interrupt then immediately, so that it doesn't have to wake up again when the timer fires. (in fact it would be nice if the guest could somehow poll at the irq mask at waking from idle, so that it wouldn't need a vmexit/entry for every such interrupt, but just do the right thing for all pending work) In addition, yes it'll be a helper function, but since all drivers will want the functionality its probably best off in the generic code -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/