Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932077AbXBVOUr (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:20:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933070AbXBVOUr (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:20:47 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:43149 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932077AbXBVOUq (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:20:46 -0500 Subject: Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1] From: Arjan van de Ven To: Pierre Ossman Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Thomas Gleixner , Luca Tettamanti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <45DDA43A.4030509@drzeus.cx> References: <20070221230409.GA1158@dreamland.darkstar.lan> <1172099859.25076.132.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1172150712.3531.265.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <45DDA43A.4030509@drzeus.cx> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:20:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1172154034.3531.270.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-3.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1213 Lines: 32 On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 15:10 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > some can be used for both (PIT), but on a concept level the uses are > > independent. The advantage of local apic over PIT is that local apic is > > cheap to do "one shot" future events with, while the PIT will tick > > periodic at a fixed frequency. With tickless idle.. that's not what you > > want. > > > > So with a local apic, and acpi_pm as clocksource, I shouldn't be getting timer > interrupts? timer interrupts as in "irq0"? you shouldn't if you use the hrtimers/tickless stuff... can you get us a dmesg somewhere? maybe the kernel mentions why ;) > Yet I do. Which I assume means that the kernel will still get woken > up very often. if irq0 keeps increasing at 100Hz or 1000Hz or so.. then yes -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/