Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:41:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:41:31 -0500 Received: from [208.48.139.185] ([208.48.139.185]:49566 "HELO forty.greenhydrant.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:41:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 09:41:10 -0800 From: David Rees To: lkml Subject: Re: Release Policy [was: Linux 2.4.16 ] Message-ID: <20011126094110.B7703@greenhydrant.com> Mail-Followup-To: David Rees , lkml In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from marcelo@conectiva.com.br on Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:54:11PM -0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:54:11PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > I like the ISC's release methods. The do -rc's (-pre's would be fine > > for the kernel as it is already established), each -rc fixes problems > > found with the previous. When an -rc has been out long enough with no > > more bug reports they release that code, WITHOUT changes. > > Thats exactly the idea with the "pre-final" thingie. Most groups use -rc release candidate releases, so using that instead of -pre-final would lead to the least confusion. A 2.4.17 release might look like this: Release 2.4.17-preX until all the new stuff you want is in. Release 2.4.17-rcX until no-one complains about the new stuff. Release the last 2.4.17-rcX as 2.4.17 and hope no one finds anything embarassing (which will probably happen anyway. Seems to me though, that you can simply put a note in your Changelog which -pre releases are bound to be to the next final revision, this will save us from yet another numbering scheme. -Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/