Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp3890364pxp; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:16:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwn4fLHUw6g3lkAQTBt9ogSRSYrj0B8zhAyadJ/RsH4klcRxJ5nft2z61iIKPiYvXBfCshR X-Received: by 2002:a63:f12:0:b0:381:d61:afc9 with SMTP id e18-20020a630f12000000b003810d61afc9mr18704364pgl.237.1647357386397; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:16:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1647357386; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hU09ts/h0gwLlke80zStqw+CK3mcL3bZC7dR1auZaxRRilt52HXHi6TXxCdcn6Wm4D LxUUEB+NU+5WknFZXn9Qk4XQWpgypfxXXToO1m3vVnA8knEVmZLBhGsgPzR/4OtQsM5c xy64PFPIPQe0EGWi+8wT4qPwganRNocZYjBO83kKIVX4TpG3cp0pGiW8OxgIRDJEYiGD 9ZkwVzM0fkbHvJj4wdsHRVOQrNzlj5IpsBWoWrx33d1nYA1RaEt2BSXm2C4331eNyT9Y 7ITyroAGXpf3Cy7FiFsm4T5S8IeARds+St5ATg2R0FPDRaFiqL211TqeafE58Xw1TGe0 IwkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to :date:references:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=drwHWNnMfFqpoy5LVUffdKwnr/1GdMdocV8g9icGCiw=; b=JikJiE7z5VocM9flQm1t9iGHfAt2zpz1ReegiglPIl+KyTlJ0B9pMJuZoFtrh+4O3Z KPpoyGZM6y70ooPokwmDWfGS2y4dP4feLBsB6bLy6jwJmhq1+sx06cYZCBT5aRUcJwPP SEA7ydUbn4xdtdGw8C84OAonkgF4XZw+8cs0XJ6qsoUdQv53vKdhuPlYmYnANAU0V4bv pNTm4U2SkYfU4+KR4aJ3417Cc8rGvA9GI0Uo+VU0KOAMcU/mIXElqHjYC2/D9OCDdskR GA3yoJ7EJn70VjWlML+Ycdr0fSVlIkx7j5aI91TblqrAKKQiRKiC1pNGcBs7d01FdNmF Lslw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=aUfArf4E; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n11-20020a17090ac68b00b001bf68eca28csi2228440pjt.49.2022.03.15.08.16.04; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:16:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=aUfArf4E; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244439AbiCOAfm (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 20:35:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42258 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232791AbiCOAfk (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 20:35:40 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0B683B007; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:34:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1647304469; x=1678840469; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to: message-id:mime-version; bh=XQ4rcun35JKs85E4Y+M1ZfvI2sKujSfLpEMpVPq0Spg=; b=aUfArf4ExONjHTuOpnwJmMt/sjV3rZxcWoJ8VDdK7lJElFeLTb3AoFtZ nX7xfLEXmAMUiccQPJLgc0tQbB860neL69pplOv0ayHGXXwBhdmLVd0zi xIH4//QAMysJImOP5wQuFO+CQckvyP68QjqHTaCV6negiUIRah7MDXAv2 Uze1IznHlw5/KnCCMf6V86pwMQfB7FdbC/DUoCDJEWiO8hSR3ESfcvwYh XctdJQNsB5JlOeuJ7hQl33UUf5dLWzJ8XUpIk2mNQsUlFtVsgsgA9CgAt /UjXKqy2t0R67APRYN1F3cm716QdmqLiN7InQQbn4l9dX0igrm4hFiHOC A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10286"; a="342607366" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,181,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="342607366" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2022 17:34:29 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,181,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="713957692" Received: from yhuang6-desk2.sh.intel.com (HELO yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com) ([10.239.13.94]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2022 17:34:20 -0700 From: "Huang, Ying" To: Yu Zhao Cc: kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Aneesh Kumar , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Hillf Danton , Jens Axboe , Jesse Barnes , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Matthew Wilcox , Mel Gorman , Michael Larabel , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Linux ARM , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , linux-kernel , Linux-MM , Kernel Page Reclaim v2 , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Brian Geffon , Jan Alexander Steffens , Oleksandr Natalenko , Steven Barrett , Suleiman Souhlal , Daniel Byrne , Donald Carr , Holger =?utf-8?Q?Hoffst=C3=A4tte?= , Konstantin Kharlamov , Shuang Zhai , Sofia Trinh , Vaibhav Jain Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: groundwork References: <20220309021230.721028-1-yuzhao@google.com> <20220309021230.721028-6-yuzhao@google.com> <875yoh552i.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:34:18 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Yu Zhao's message of "Mon, 14 Mar 2022 03:30:31 -0600") Message-ID: <87mths3vg5.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yu Zhao writes: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:09 AM Huang, Ying wrote: >> >> Hi, Yu, >> >> Yu Zhao writes: >> > diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig >> > index 3326ee3903f3..747ab1690bcf 100644 >> > --- a/mm/Kconfig >> > +++ b/mm/Kconfig >> > @@ -892,6 +892,16 @@ config ANON_VMA_NAME >> > area from being merged with adjacent virtual memory areas due to the >> > difference in their name. >> > >> > +# the multi-gen LRU { >> > +config LRU_GEN >> > + bool "Multi-Gen LRU" >> > + depends on MMU >> > + # the following options can use up the spare bits in page flags >> > + depends on !MAXSMP && (64BIT || !SPARSEMEM || SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) >> >> LRU_GEN depends on !MAXSMP. So, What is the maximum NR_CPUS supported >> by LRU_GEN? > > LRU_GEN doesn't really care about NR_CPUS. IOW, it doesn't impose a > max number. The dependency is with NODES_SHIFT selected by MAXSMP: > default "10" if MAXSMP > This combined with LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT can exhaust the spare bits in page flags. From the following code snippets from page-flags-layout.h, LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT is related to NR_CPUS instead of NODES_SHIFT. #define LAST__PID_SHIFT 8 #define LAST__PID_MASK ((1 << LAST__PID_SHIFT)-1) #define LAST__CPU_SHIFT NR_CPUS_BITS #define LAST__CPU_MASK ((1 << LAST__CPU_SHIFT)-1) #define LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT (LAST__PID_SHIFT+LAST__CPU_SHIFT) Best Regards, Huang, Ying [snip]