Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751713AbXBVQv1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:51:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751725AbXBVQv1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:51:27 -0500 Received: from palrel10.hp.com ([156.153.255.245]:38822 "EHLO palrel10.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751708AbXBVQv0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:51:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:51:23 -0600 From: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" To: Andrew Morton Cc: mike.miller@hp.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@novell.com Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support Message-ID: <20070222165123.GC2672@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net> References: <20070221211039.GA2672@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net> <20070221191427.9b7cf4b0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070221191427.9b7cf4b0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1809 Lines: 41 On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:14:27PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:10:39 -0600 "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" wrote: > > > Patch 1/2 > > > > This patch changes the way we determine if a logical volume is larger than 2TB. The > > original test looked for a total_size of 0. Originally we added 1 to the total_size. > > That would make our read_capacity return size 0 for >2TB lv's. We assumed that we > > could not have a lv size of 0 so it seemed OK until we were in a clustered system. The > > backup node would see a size of 0 due to the reservation on the drive. That caused > > the driver to switch to 16-byte CDB's which are not supported on older controllers. > > After that everything was broken. > > It may seem petty but I don't see the value in trying to determine if the LBA is > > beyond the 2TB boundary. That's why when we switch we use 16-byte CDB's for all > > read/write operations. > > Please consider this for inclusion. > > > > ... > > > > + if (total_size == 0xFFFFFFFF) { > > I seem to remember having already questioned this. total_size is sector_t, which > can be either 32-bit or 64-bit. Are you sure that comparison works as > intended in both cases? > > > > + if(total_size == 0xFFFFFFFF) { > > cciss_read_capacity_16(cntl_num, i, 0, > > &total_size, &block_size); > > hba[cntl_num]->cciss_read = CCISS_READ_16; > > Here too. It has worked in all of the configs I've tested. Should I change it from sector_t to a __64? I have not tested all possible configs. -- mikem - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/