Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751294AbXBVR0P (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:26:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751331AbXBVR0P (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:26:15 -0500 Received: from lmv.inov.pt ([146.193.64.2]:43122 "EHLO lmv.inov.pt" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751294AbXBVR0O convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:26:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20070222172410.yfd76j1g3k48gc44@webmail.inov.pt> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:24:10 +0000 From: jose.goncalves@inov.pt To: Russell King Cc: "Michael K. Edwards" , Frederik Deweerdt , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Serial related oops References: <20070219150508.GD27370@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45D9D073.7020701@inov.pt> <20070219164200.GF27370@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45D9E46C.4030408@inov.pt> <20070219212347.GA4258@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45DC537B.6020108@inov.pt> <20070221230503.GA28156@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070222085413.GB15841@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45DDB1A6.8020409@inov.pt> <20070222165650.GA633@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20070222165650.GA633@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4) X-INOV-EmailServer-Information: Please contact the Email service provider for more information X-INOV-EmailServer: Found to be clean X-INOV-EmailServer-From: jose.goncalves@inov.pt Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1375 Lines: 39 Quoting Russell King : > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 03:07:18PM +0000, Jose Goncalves wrote: >> Russell King wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:34:15PM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote: >> > >> >> Are you using an unpatched gcc 4.1.1? Its optimizer did nasty things >> >> to us, at least on an ARM target ... >> >> >> > >> > That's ruled out. Please think about it for a moment - serial_in() >> > managed to work correctly most of the time, and then spontaneously >> > changes its well-defined ABI behaviour in a way that analysis of the >> > asm doesn't allow it to. >> > >> >> I'm using gcc 3.4.6. >> But I agree with Russell, if it was such a problem it would hit on the >> first iteration of my application and not after 1 day of executing the >> same piece of code... > > One thing you might think about is running memtest86 on the machine > for the same kind of time interval, just in case it's something trivial > like bad ram. > OK. That's another thing to do. Meanwhile I've switched to another SBC and I'm now running my application on the new unit. Lets wait and see... Jos? Gon?alves - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/