Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:13:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
       Arjan Van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
       Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, hch@infradead.org,
       akpm@zip.com.au, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
       zach.brown@oracle.com, suparna@in.ibm.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
       tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
In-Reply-To: <20070222.064704.71093028.davem@davemloft.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702221210170.1356@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
References: <20070222123929.GA5208@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070222.054127.104035694.davem@davemloft.net>
 <20070222143145.GA3246@elte.hu> <20070222.064704.71093028.davem@davemloft.net>
X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://www.xmailserver.org/davidel.asc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 647
Lines: 19

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, David Miller wrote:

> The more I think about it, a reasonable solution might actually be to
> use threadlets for disk I/O and pure event based processing for
> networking.  It is two different handling paths and non-unified,
> but that might be the price for good performance :-)

Well, it takes 20 lines of userspace C code to bring *unification* to the 
universe ;)


- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/