Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751964AbXBVV50 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:57:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751965AbXBVV5Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:57:25 -0500 Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:37463 "EHLO netops-testserver-4.corp.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751964AbXBVV5Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:57:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:57:23 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Pekka J Enberg , Pekka Enberg cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] slab: free pages in a batch in drain_freelist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 749 Lines: 18 On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > As suggested by William, free the actual pages in a batch so that we > don't keep pounding on l3->list_lock. This means holding the l3->list_lock for a prolonged time period. The existing code was done this way in order to make sure that the interrupt holdoffs are minimal. There is no pounding. The cacheline with the list_lock is typically held until the draining is complete. While we drain the freelist we need to be able to respond to interrupts. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/