Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752077AbXBWASx (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:18:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752076AbXBWASx (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:18:53 -0500 Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net ([24.71.223.10]:12115 "EHLO pd2mo2so.prod.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752062AbXBWASw (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:18:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:18:47 -0600 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: add NCQ blacklist entries from Silicon Image Windows driver In-reply-to: <3A2F4CD2-EF4C-4C5D-B1B3-A9C89BA9682C@develooper.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , "Eric D. Mudama" Message-id: <45DE32E7.1010901@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <45DD2EC9.4050403@shaw.ca> <45DD3EC7.3050801@garzik.org> <3A2F4CD2-EF4C-4C5D-B1B3-A9C89BA9682C@develooper.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1587 Lines: 44 Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote: > > On Feb 21, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> + /* The following blacklist entries are taken from the Windows >>> + driver .inf files for the Silicon Image 3124 and 3132. */ >>> + { "Maxtor 7B250S0", "BANC1B70", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, }, > [...] >> >> Do we have information that these drives fail on non-SiI controllers? > > At least tangentially related: > > On one of my boxes (running 2.6.18-1.2869 from Fedora) I have a couple > of other Maxtor drives that didn't like NCQ. They are on a JMicron > 20360/20363 (ahci driver). (There's also a Promise 300 TX4 card in the > box and an Intel ICH8 that shows up with ata_piix). > > model and (partial) firmware revision of the drives: > Maxtor 7V300F0 VA11 > Maxtor 7B300S0 BANC > > Until I disabled NCQ I got gazillions of messages like the ones below > and absymal performance. > > - ask > > > ata5: spurious interrupt (irq_stat 0x8 active_tag -84148995 sactive 0xf) Sounds like those are some that we should be blacklisting as well, unless Eric has a good reason why not (CCing). Can you provide the full firmware revision strings from those drives, i.e. from "hdparm -I"? -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/