Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp940530pxp; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 22:02:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVMwG4nnr1vIAhxcEfem77hkQgl7/3LXF633NRt8XWUGkpkkR0fXfeKTO0s75dsJoKvEAc X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ccc1:b0:151:fbe6:4982 with SMTP id z1-20020a170902ccc100b00151fbe64982mr2864727ple.124.1647493377230; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 22:02:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1647493377; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Z7vpjUXHlx4xBC1qVUmKklcU7/l+Iv+FhW4Es8Eekkn8f0lf+2O8t5baVopDFikJdF 57rkaQrxe5KMTOqbTGM6qF5hRZJPscTzvaQkk1OB/ZXcXp/s/IWTPInJWrZ9yC7PsK3O dcu4gPrP3yZEe/r3He5H/gwu6vEODn3lI6uG3FXxnuoVOjHKHuEkPQSGRRwaripdWZsC +tbcu/KK1OG7WYGrE9dqMnYaiX+LOCSbYtmmBPqUkjAYqDO11St0bDsIC8AFnR+G1wgc suc5qdQBPvi4hy2fABy336y8T1gUleE1Rglili0WltRVxkEAOVOOIhmBvDflRyf/3nt6 nzEQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=teDzTOpQ2S8PwAjV8lyFv22pc1q/GxS3mxG8k7glWZA=; b=X1zl5vQQxsQ03ssRLBG3I0cJqQ65YzWxP28OUCPeaIBUjeQE4zuQraMImCjOJW3dKT HRFitifBj56UGXW0+ZWsRgEjPmRwQt11sPd2zsczVdicCwpx2bCjfQfBvLsuO8WxcG3G EtQ0cX7m/E8Ka+Dw148IokxuJcA9VvGnAQeLiL2SiDR95qPnjz7yXRJGI1M4PLOmMBgf CObZ7EaE8wn9q6t+c+RUB94PNYDzjFCzTfp9qQisuhRS8WHf/gIu+uwS+wfrBq1eqfrb uEWL4oZpRzEPccQu6yaXHAMSikmmBMGgNefK7woPUzZnSLrqYamAvj59VhmVGgGXixUh yprA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=p1WyPXvW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [2620:137:e000::1:18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g6-20020a656cc6000000b003820502bd64si920024pgw.231.2022.03.16.22.02.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 22:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=p1WyPXvW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60A7198EE3; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1352874AbiCPOJy (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:09:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46162 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1351602AbiCPOJu (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:09:50 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9856A4AE34; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 07:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 371A0611FB; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A16A7C340EC; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:08:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1647439714; bh=teDzTOpQ2S8PwAjV8lyFv22pc1q/GxS3mxG8k7glWZA=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=p1WyPXvWw23Re9lL+sgBWu+567oqW71a7PxEV1AW3ytchmDo9HtNDMVo840Ig0WrK a7rFyxlfaBkOtj8HHguNxAqwzmo4gJQ6ZooLcQtvIut/E0EizBv9ec3zBm7LG/U5lz YGuHK750in9EuoK3WC56ygGCkT7H7GpEvQT26x3I88k2eDZC/XUcEEoQQkN4kpv2r+ wVcfgK+vQ1vhA/zKAlsuEcGFeOl1A7O4o1kzzRFf+g4Y1JbEjBjltnrZhrWmCnOAHt eVnvNdLN41Ux/lUrkLxZdhkXOFpB+nLIYBbE0pzbtXQwBLZpCotK8a1DqqrfqSNbVl iGLdAuzxhshgw== Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id v2-20020a7bcb42000000b0037b9d960079so3322910wmj.0; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 07:08:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dJyxwVCq8wqTGPsT/VATfXW1w/nLCK4104a0cOTCsI62/S53C l+rDFTraEDqMr8zfqO+IwlT3EQvFPF+6sSbAB9c= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c8c5:0:b0:389:d4f1:7cb with SMTP id f5-20020a7bc8c5000000b00389d4f107cbmr2791355wml.3.1647439712978; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 07:08:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1d93:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 07:08:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20220316145728.709d85e0@suse.de> References: <20220311114746.7643-1-vkarasulli@suse.de> <20220311114746.7643-2-vkarasulli@suse.de> <20220316145728.709d85e0@suse.de> From: Namjae Jeon Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 23:08:32 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] exfat: add keep_last_dots mount option To: David Disseldorp Cc: Vasant Karasulli , Sungjong Seo , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , Kohada.Tetsuhiro@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2022-03-16 22:57 GMT+09:00, David Disseldorp : > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:20:28 +0100, Vasant Karasulli wrote: > >> On So 13-03-22 09:01:32, Namjae Jeon wrote: >> > 2022-03-11 20:47 GMT+09:00, Vasant Karasulli : >> > > The "keep_last_dots" mount option will, in a >> > > subsequent commit, control whether or not trailing periods '.' are >> > > stripped >> > > from path components during file lookup or file creation. >> > I don't know why the 1/2 patch should be split from the 2/2 patch. >> > Wouldn't it be better to combine them? Otherwise it looks good to me. >> >> I just followed the same patch structure as was in the initial version >> of the patch. > > I'm fine with having both patches squashed together. @Namjae: should we > resubmit as a single patch or can you do the squash on your side before > submitting to Linus? I would be grateful if you resubmit it to the list after making it one:) Thanks! > > Cheers, David >