Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752155AbXBWJge (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:36:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752151AbXBWJge (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:36:34 -0500 Received: from matups.math.u-psud.fr ([129.175.50.4]:56890 "EHLO matups.math.u-psud.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752155AbXBWJgd (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:36:33 -0500 From: Duncan Sands To: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usbatm: Detect usb device shutdown and ignore failed urbs. Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:36:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Simon Arlott <254ad70138dc1cdf241hjzcr0007jhhw@thunder.lp0.eu>, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <45DCBC26.1050308@simon.arlott.org.uk> <200702221143.38809.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr> <20070222155318.19b423a9.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20070222155318.19b423a9.zaitcev@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702231036.14048.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1260 Lines: 32 Hi Pete, On Friday 23 February 2007 00:53:18 Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:43:38 +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > > > + /* the module/device has probably been removed */ > > > + if (urb->status == -ESHUTDOWN) > > > + return; > > > + > > > if (printk_ratelimit()) > > > atm_warn(channel->usbatm, "%s: urb 0x%p failed (%d)!\n", > > > __func__, urb, urb->status); > > > > I would rather just suppress the warning in this case, and still do the delayed > > schedule of the tasklet, in case this error was spurious and we're not really > > about to be disconnected. > > I disagree. If ESHUTDOWN is received, the endpoint is definitely gone. > I can see why you might want to retry EPROTO, ELISEQ, etc. but this > case is different. if you get ESHUTDOWN, does that mean that you are about to be disconnected, i.e. the disconnect method is about to be called? Or is it possible for the device to just sit there disabled, but not disconnected? Thanks, Duncan. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/