Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@intel.com,
        luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Cc:     sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
        ak@linux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com,
        hpa@zytor.com, jgross@suse.com, jmattson@google.com,
        joro@8bytes.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, knsathya@kernel.org,
        pbonzini@redhat.com, sdeep@vmware.com, seanjc@google.com,
        tony.luck@intel.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com,
        thomas.lendacky@amd.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 03/30] x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and
 __tdx_hypercall() helper functions
In-Reply-To: <20220316020856.24435-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
References: <20220316020856.24435-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <20220316020856.24435-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:43:23 +0100
Message-ID: <87ilsd31lw.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 16 2022 at 05:08, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> +/*
> + * Wrapper for standard use of __tdx_hypercall with no output aside from
> + * return code.
> + */
> +static inline u64 _tdx_hypercall(u64 fn, u64 r12, u64 r13, u64 r14, u64 r15)
> +{
> +	struct tdx_hypercall_args args = {
> +		.r10 = TDX_HYPERCALL_STANDARD,
> +		.r11 = fn,
> +		.r12 = r12,
> +		.r13 = r13,
> +		.r14 = r14,
> +		.r15 = r15,
> +	};
> +
> +	return __tdx_hypercall(&args, 0);
> +}
> +
> +/* Called from __tdx_hypercall() for unrecoverable failure */
> +void __tdx_hypercall_failed(void)
> +{
> +	panic("TDVMCALL failed. TDX module bug?");
> +}
>  void __init tdx_early_init(void)

Lacks a new line before tdx_early_init().

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>