Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S282008AbRKZS2W>; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:28:22 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S282014AbRKZS1F>; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:27:05 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:38916 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S282009AbRKZSZZ>; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:25:25 -0500
Subject: Re: Which gcc version?
To: jjasen1@umbc.edu (John Jasen)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:31:44 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: jjs@pobox.com (J Sloan), lgb@lgb.hu, arjanv@redhat.com (Arjan van de Ven),
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.31L.02.0111231532000.13038141-100000@irix2.gl.umbc.edu> from "John Jasen" at Nov 23, 2001 03:34:11 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E168QXg-00069p-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> That said, the versions in 7.1, and the patches available have done
> reasonably well for everything that I've tried to compile (kernels
> included).
> 
> What are they going to do about gcc 3.0.x? It'll be amusing to watch.

Its shipped as an additional compiler as well. The only real question now is
how long before 3.x becomes really solid. That should be in time for the
next RH major update I hope
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/