Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:57:05 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To:     =?utf-8?B?5a2Z5a6I6ZGr?= <sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn>
Cc:     j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
        davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
        dsahern@kernel.org, oliver@neukum.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, huyd12@chinatelecom.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] net:bonding:Add support for IPV6 RLB to
 balance-alb mode
Message-ID: <YjGmYe9CuNiYSgk0@nanopsycho>
References: <20220315073008.17441-1-sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn>
 <20220315073008.17441-4-sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn>
 <YjB0wCcubE6713C+@nanopsycho>
 <c5d18455-c2ff-6e1d-c2d5-55417995c014@chinatelecom.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <c5d18455-c2ff-6e1d-c2d5-55417995c014@chinatelecom.cn>
Precedence: bulk

Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:45:05AM CET, sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
>
>在 2022/3/15 19:13, Jiri Pirko 写道:
>> Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:30:07AM CET, sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
>> > This patch is implementing IPV6 RLB for balance-alb mode.
>> Out of curiosity, what is exactly your usecase? I'm asking because
>> I don't see any good reason to use RLB/ALB modes. I have to be missing
>> something.
>
>
>This is previous discusion thread：
>
>https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4187085.html

I don't see how it even remotely answers my question. Could you please
spell it out for me here again? Thanks!