Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:57:28 +0100
From:   David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
To:     Vasant Karasulli <vkarasulli@suse.de>,
        Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc:     Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
        Kohada.Tetsuhiro@dc.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] exfat: add keep_last_dots mount option
Message-ID: <20220316145728.709d85e0@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <YjGr3IpZ4p55YuAB@vasant-suse>
References: <20220311114746.7643-1-vkarasulli@suse.de>
        <20220311114746.7643-2-vkarasulli@suse.de>
        <CAKYAXd9kdYi4rXmyfAO3ZbmKLu3i35QzsL_oOorROYieQnWGRg@mail.gmail.com>
        <YjGr3IpZ4p55YuAB@vasant-suse>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:20:28 +0100, Vasant Karasulli wrote:

> On So 13-03-22 09:01:32, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> > 2022-03-11 20:47 GMT+09:00, Vasant Karasulli <vkarasulli@suse.de>:  
> > > The "keep_last_dots" mount option will, in a
> > > subsequent commit, control whether or not trailing periods '.' are stripped
> > > from path components during file lookup or file creation.  
> > I don't know why the 1/2 patch should be split from the 2/2 patch.
> > Wouldn't it be better to combine them? Otherwise it looks good to me.  
> 
> I just followed the same patch structure as was in the initial version
> of the patch.

I'm fine with having both patches squashed together. @Namjae: should we
resubmit as a single patch or can you do the squash on your side before
submitting to Linus?

Cheers, David