Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220212130410.6901-16-ojeda@kernel.org> <8baf7006-90ed-25b8-3005-69b5475215cf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8baf7006-90ed-25b8-3005-69b5475215cf@gmail.com>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Mar 2022 09:19:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CANiq72mQffofeW4C=AWF4CHu=WpgpwB4hAv_q9QiTX_+U38qGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/20] docs: add Rust documentation
To:     Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
        Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@gmail.com>,
        Boris-Chengbiao Zhou <bobo1239@web.de>,
        Wu XiangCheng <bobwxc@email.cn>, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
        Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.de>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        rust-for-linux <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Akira,

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:47 AM Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/rust/logo.svg b/Documentation/rust/logo.svg
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..65be792a5abe
> > --- /dev/null
>
> How about adding a suitable license identifier in a comment?

For the next round, I did not apply this suggestion, because it is
unclear which license identifier to use: it would be probably be the
same as the `COPYING-logo` one (which would be used also for the Tux
SVG, if it gets merged -- it was sent a while ago).

Cheers,
Miguel