Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:47:35 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Cc:     linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, jonas@southpole.se,
        stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, shorne@gmail.com,
        mingo@redhat.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, jszhang@kernel.org,
        wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: Move to queued RW locks
Message-ID: <YjMDt8BgtIZZH8IY@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20220316232600.20419-1-palmer@rivosinc.com>
 <20220316232600.20419-6-palmer@rivosinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220316232600.20419-6-palmer@rivosinc.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 04:26:00PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> 
> With the move to fair spinlocks, we might as well move to fair rwlocks.

s/might as well/can/ ?

Note that qrwlock relies on spinlock to be/provide fairness.

> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>