Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp1621358pxp; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 12:55:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9elDoVJgn+iLiIfF5j9Ok3e4uA/z1Q84SVNztg/L395eAnaUKIFRrc8Y1msduaPvR1cnH X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3851:b0:1c6:584c:acc4 with SMTP id nl17-20020a17090b385100b001c6584cacc4mr11910059pjb.76.1647546957645; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 12:55:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1647546957; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pdY3OVUYq/Gv9MpCk1JLoyPHEmQu+yovIml8+DNakgX26e/L0uzh+6txjNlk7cxc1K MmE3bKlk8sqKSP5OS0gs1RZXdrUHFAdPah3ruGR6kE9oy812slMWqXyQhkDbXwBafK0N SPh7N5+038Jv80Ov4+gHTmj+XWKJllRKePXoY/WeWJtOqoJ2XoimR4WoyFEtpuyuI+TK 8JWPoEen1yGailkg/5qkYRiH9w+iLfTDIy8w/lKVS9gbMTJ+t3gEhE7Vr3nEgJ3eRk2N rqO+KU2dbgCgTkCKTxAlBK5GH830x20WJ4HVRCm6EHGiA+TkGmOc/bh+MDhLAhW1JrmZ b5Aw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=/btJxTnQjnKNbMrzNy7ds5xsYEkMX8DN5XsDZVw5jUU=; b=zip6O5jeKtWHusvYlZLwJYkALjSPHJgeN7uYhXDqCqhFMgVa+kRSz+sihclfID38/V 2SoY+56Ijm8OPNrCnFAxBx6UMt0mp9M6s85KTxXlXsuyr4owFivsDsvzqWyYU8Ukh/5x paka9YXwedgt5OzZ1mCTGx5gLu9y/ZfSwl4QaB6XarkK0EdlAVWLsLFGG8cCLdzRjZJb Q4TNPN3l4JREpMK6B2ChLy2CHrIA4Ud6kf5Yh1BmSD4NEihhKR/TmP3zvFQWtns0bKd1 uBV8Yte4v2teZiFjWM7fO9vAeDKT+ByMCvQt7IzAt1CIIQD1q17vIqBxE5MUUIUEaW9v +/0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n1-20020a17090a670100b001bd14e01f43si8244209pjj.49.2022.03.17.12.55.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 17 Mar 2022 12:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB5526454D; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 12:50:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236941AbiCQRgp (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:36:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52630 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233856AbiCQRgn (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:36:43 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924C2C74BA for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EE71682; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lpieralisi (unknown [10.57.7.119]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00A9B3F7B4; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 17:35:23 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andre Przywara , Thomas Gleixner , Eric Auger Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] irqchip/gic-v3: Detect LPI invalidation MMIO registers Message-ID: References: <20220315165034.794482-1-maz@kernel.org> <20220315165034.794482-3-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220315165034.794482-3-maz@kernel.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:50:33PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Since GICv4.1, an implementation can offer the same MMIO-based > implementation as DirectLPI, only with an ITS. Given that this > can be hugely beneficial for workloads that are very LPI masking > heavy (although these workloads are admitedly a bit odd). > > Interestingly, this is independent of RVPEI, which only *implies* > the functionnality. > > So let's detect whether the implementation has GICR_CTLR.IR set, > and propagate this as DirectLPI to the ITS driver. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > index 736163d36b13..363bfe172033 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > @@ -918,7 +918,11 @@ static int gic_populate_rdist(void) > static int __gic_update_rdist_properties(struct redist_region *region, > void __iomem *ptr) > { > - u64 typer = gic_read_typer(ptr + GICR_TYPER); > + u64 typer; > + u32 ctlr; > + > + typer = gic_read_typer(ptr + GICR_TYPER); > + ctlr = readl_relaxed(ptr + GICR_CTLR); > > /* Boot-time cleanip */ > if ((typer & GICR_TYPER_VLPIS) && (typer & GICR_TYPER_RVPEID)) { > @@ -941,6 +945,7 @@ static int __gic_update_rdist_properties(struct redist_region *region, > /* RVPEID implies some form of DirectLPI, no matter what the doc says... :-/ */ > gic_data.rdists.has_rvpeid &= !!(typer & GICR_TYPER_RVPEID); > gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi &= (!!(typer & GICR_TYPER_DirectLPIS) | > + !!(ctlr & GICR_CTLR_IR) | > gic_data.rdists.has_rvpeid); > gic_data.rdists.has_vpend_valid_dirty &= !!(typer & GICR_TYPER_DIRTY); > > @@ -962,7 +967,11 @@ static void gic_update_rdist_properties(void) > gic_iterate_rdists(__gic_update_rdist_properties); > if (WARN_ON(gic_data.ppi_nr == UINT_MAX)) > gic_data.ppi_nr = 0; > - pr_info("%d PPIs implemented\n", gic_data.ppi_nr); > + pr_info("GICv3 features: %d PPIs, %s%s\n", > + gic_data.ppi_nr, > + gic_data.has_rss ? "RSS " : "", > + gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi ? "DirectLPI " : ""); I understand GICR_CTLR.IR detection (which is v4.1 feature) - I don't get why in this patch we are adding a GICv3 DirectLPI info dump (hunk above), it is probably nitpicking but the hunk above does not seem to belong in this patch - it is a separate print info refactoring or I am reading it wrongly. Lorenzo > + > if (gic_data.rdists.has_vlpis) > pr_info("GICv4 features: %s%s%s\n", > gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi ? "DirectLPI " : "", > @@ -1797,8 +1806,6 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base, > irq_domain_update_bus_token(gic_data.domain, DOMAIN_BUS_WIRED); > > gic_data.has_rss = !!(typer & GICD_TYPER_RSS); > - pr_info("Distributor has %sRange Selector support\n", > - gic_data.has_rss ? "" : "no "); > > if (typer & GICD_TYPER_MBIS) { > err = mbi_init(handle, gic_data.domain); > diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h > index 12d91f0dedf9..aeb8ced53880 100644 > --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h > +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h > @@ -127,6 +127,8 @@ > #define GICR_PIDR2 GICD_PIDR2 > > #define GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS (1UL << 0) > +#define GICR_CTLR_IR (1UL << 1) > +#define GICR_CTLR_CES (1UL << 2) > #define GICR_CTLR_RWP (1UL << 3) > > #define GICR_TYPER_CPU_NUMBER(r) (((r) >> 8) & 0xffff) > -- > 2.34.1 >