Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:21:59 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] kunit: Support redirecting function calls
Message-ID: <20220318092159.6f275782@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20220318021314.3225240-1-davidgow@google.com>
References: <20220318021314.3225240-1-davidgow@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:13:12 +0800
David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:

> Does either (or both) of these features sound useful, and is this
> sort-of API the right model? (Personally, I think there's a reasonable
> scope for both.) Is anything obviously missing or wrong? Do the names,
> descriptions etc. make any sense?

Obviously I'm biased toward the ftrace solution ;-)

-- Steve