Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932882AbXBXPSD (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:18:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933006AbXBXPSD (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:18:03 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:16956 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932882AbXBXPSB (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:18:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=kna74/9QzyWKt4pZKMKhG71xyueeWnb9Rv2dqJNWOPeIFOr8GdxJM6jw1ZWz2TRX4rBo/JhbpVheKG0XG1EPB9/vNJ1wYHkRUptHMNW/heCy1hqH6htOYCdshseG2kMPWEDZWkKjMB1UmKP/OGjjAUebwJIzEigUsNYY5JdSNfY= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: "Patrick Ale" Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Sata RAID Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:24:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: linux-kernel References: <8d158e1f0702240210x71f981a6xf2fe8917dac5e91a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8d158e1f0702240210x71f981a6xf2fe8917dac5e91a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702241624.17024.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1321 Lines: 42 use device mapper and dmraid http://people.redhat.com/~heinzm/sw/dmraid/ and please read http://linux-ata.org/faq-sata-raid.html On Saturday 24 February 2007, Patrick Ale wrote: > Hi, > > Quick question, > > Since I am going to open my server today to do some pata tests (for > the weird detection problems people are giving me fantastic help with, > no sarcasm, I really mean it) I thought: why not add two 320GB SATA > disks on the SATA controller that the mainboard has. > > I am wondering: should I use the onboard RAID function? Is this > supported by Linux? I remember back in "the old days (TM)" there were > seperate (spelling) drivers for ataraid, how does the current 2.6 > branch cope with the RAID functions of modern motherboards? > > I am aware that it is NOT hardware raid, the raid is done in the > driver, which is why you need this fancy boot disk before installing > Windows on your RAID set. > > Or would you suggest me to stick with MD devices? > > > Cheers, > > Patrick Ale > patrick.ale@gmail.com > > "kun kasvan isoksi, halun olla poro" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/