Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750729AbXBXRME (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:12:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750966AbXBXRMD (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:12:03 -0500 Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:47381 "EHLO out5.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750729AbXBXRMB (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:12:01 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: RCjr3SW4cFyQ92OxIO/OQnbTw7OOkD6+Wd8MvPCspnQ6 1172337119 In-Reply-To: <200702241624.17024.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <8d158e1f0702240210x71f981a6xf2fe8917dac5e91a@mail.gmail.com> <200702241624.17024.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6C96CE3D-85F5-479D-BD44-F5DA0AE744FF@fastmail.to> Cc: linux-kernel Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael-Luke Jones Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Sata RAID Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 17:11:56 +0000 To: Patrick Ale X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1874 Lines: 60 But using 'fakeraid' (i.e. BIOS RAID) together with dmraid is generally discouraged in favour of using the more stable and well supported Linux Software RAID functionality. Michael-Luke On 24 Feb 2007, at 15:24, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > use device mapper and dmraid > > http://people.redhat.com/~heinzm/sw/dmraid/ > > and please read > > http://linux-ata.org/faq-sata-raid.html > > On Saturday 24 February 2007, Patrick Ale wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Quick question, >> >> Since I am going to open my server today to do some pata tests (for >> the weird detection problems people are giving me fantastic help >> with, >> no sarcasm, I really mean it) I thought: why not add two 320GB SATA >> disks on the SATA controller that the mainboard has. >> >> I am wondering: should I use the onboard RAID function? Is this >> supported by Linux? I remember back in "the old days (TM)" there were >> seperate (spelling) drivers for ataraid, how does the current 2.6 >> branch cope with the RAID functions of modern motherboards? >> >> I am aware that it is NOT hardware raid, the raid is done in the >> driver, which is why you need this fancy boot disk before installing >> Windows on your RAID set. >> >> Or would you suggest me to stick with MD devices? >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Patrick Ale >> patrick.ale@gmail.com >> >> "kun kasvan isoksi, halun olla poro" > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux- > kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/