Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp2257411pxp; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:08:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwlIwigG3LFLfumJ+2zL4G3aheowbUVhqBP3UGVHWgQedltQKdeOaU4dc/VD40fQ8a6+Hj X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1341:b0:4fa:a3af:6ba3 with SMTP id k1-20020a056a00134100b004faa3af6ba3mr6619469pfu.51.1647900537035; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:08:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1647900537; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=s1TqhOExLiSQuRCg60PvqpJ5QaO6SDLuKlHzLEJwrumctmMKkQu5Cjpu/E6+BSVxU6 atoGIqnPykRDzQ+f9v2DxUvD5fpDSuzvy7OpJzOALjdyAI5AQOo8u9XkzleeixK28SzB N8XyfOoJ9CIjBkmczC1BtnUkvsKwiCgQUoMymvbgl71LqJp/YqvhKJKSc5vvdpCB4Kos l6mzFiuNZ4/ZRA9C6VX31douyW6uBgHip/DIPHi6YzRNY1WhLMKhjcHXBTm6khozPHtE f6UaJ7K4+Ahvl/K20jDFXpSWhzocEN47yID9Zl8Qo2Okv3Rc5PCJBJBNL3eB/jTKnurP mkUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=kNkV45zQuZkhTvGKZKcmhgk7SDSL/m3JRpXy/Hbo/hY=; b=09YXWAj3ehcJ1fMfUXzVT3YEzes0a1/KVPNZbxAw5n3YXmIGyq4y66bxis2dp+PAFI VSm/g0z8COwhmnpajSi3LsB+un0NxIgg8O8EhtG+x+ENvQc7OJbRZjMxemuLn3s/yaZq CJEwESUMosF6UKVFuvPlWhZJpVzgoRK6MYxPvTbhlnyFPzZF373WJHTFSgbBWu4Qtbmc WoAY64n1FzJ4vDnAPTJIxFQmtyaNtWzjI7HwuBKHbvBWeg2vCi+XR+3Phy1hms70a6sf EIDp5bRxHH3LA33GvpbACN5ZFnBbJQ7pHFeFVWzs9olr8EupcJzBYxQKFP3rFOdVbPPz IytA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NJ6zMfW0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [2620:137:e000::1:18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 62-20020a630741000000b0038430b87da9si327788pgh.704.2022.03.21.15.08.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NJ6zMfW0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C9362BFD; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244729AbiCTE7H (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 20 Mar 2022 00:59:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35288 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234851AbiCTE7G (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2022 00:59:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA953D9E88; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 21:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id mp6-20020a17090b190600b001c6841b8a52so7835249pjb.5; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 21:57:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=kNkV45zQuZkhTvGKZKcmhgk7SDSL/m3JRpXy/Hbo/hY=; b=NJ6zMfW0vPou6MY/aluF2UhRydg/ynbvdZopQI6ga+8acA5o8F/S3eQHTFc64CiYz7 u2Ft4QwPyxyHO/jFXkxJpQEC/N43ALcVypjmE9AoV4YRdNkIAgE7P5l2FSzOw28ZcmeI Zu6fv7rqVsa587bZtrgg7dntvcbcbQAt1x8mpmFiNLiHTzu9u/+vg5riaunMOd1skV67 E8oiD2SCW3YSMxM00V1NKFsgh7oUxQpOQmNmoSknXkEa8u+dg7xbI5e/oPR2qUfANpCm RPoT8O2/X+OEn9g7HT0ib6rXE6nlXwZJYBjhzo9LnYvNnApkObtGv/tniMnc6cZvltu2 4xOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=kNkV45zQuZkhTvGKZKcmhgk7SDSL/m3JRpXy/Hbo/hY=; b=M2o25dFBX5txJL1VZMyRQZJ+IwVTaZlB7g1d2eYIjM7Tl2V8EnNXmk7WAHv/N9HS/A rkgUEz6K3JIahGYOnPyTQ8BlkS2E0seM0PFxeeAz/MV1axGwAlxkNWl6sP76jCxg35Po b4q+tz+T1J6Ok5u9nObdzuO1uq8f45n3e8bXUe3jS6r616Bsd8WDbPC+78sy2CR7j5jr Yx57BGhQiYB+yaMRf9BNlI0rB2u59Ayvf0Zfa5Y7xfz48t0+HCisvR+WFCUpT7VL3wVP 6zZyev057kXN3Acc6crWajV/9NKLw/ARFaY3MDI+W4G0lFLLg9UAzYKsDEHmwG7sA/v0 0lWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qbVcuYaJzhoi+g0ASQhJwamtS6z6xPxtbKPdvHmemURD0Njpn qfjeRQ3MlqN/WJHO0K9dT6E= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:32c7:b0:154:19dd:fd43 with SMTP id i7-20020a17090332c700b0015419ddfd43mr7250905plr.150.1647752263405; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 21:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([36.24.165.243]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k5-20020aa788c5000000b004f7a02d2724sm15112075pff.50.2022.03.19.21.57.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 19 Mar 2022 21:57:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Xiaomeng Tong To: jakobkoschel@gmail.com Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, beanhuo@micron.com, bvanassche@acm.org, daejun7.park@samsung.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, keosung.park@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: remove an unneed NULL check on list iterator Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 12:57:34 +0800 Message-Id: <20220320045734.14087-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <6EEE0ACC-6F7F-4D29-AA2B-751E4677B35E@gmail.com> References: <6EEE0ACC-6F7F-4D29-AA2B-751E4677B35E@gmail.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 01:57:39 +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote: > Maybe it make more sense to move that check after the loop body instead > of removing it completely? This code obviously does nothing in it's current > state but it's clear what the original intention was, so restoring that would > perhaps be better. > > But probably someone with more experience about this code can make the call > This seems like a better choice, if it doesn't go against the author's original intention. I will fix it in PATCH v2, thanks. -- Xiaomeng Tong