Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932914AbXBYAwH (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:52:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933608AbXBYAwH (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:52:07 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41341 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932914AbXBYAwG (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:52:06 -0500 Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:52:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20070224.165203.41636677.davem@davemloft.net> To: msa@moth.iki.fi Cc: olaf@bigred.inka.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 stacks for new link layers? From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200702241645.l1OGj3GV023299@moth.iki.fi> References: <200702231149.l1NBnlZD029626@moth.iki.fi> <200702241645.l1OGj3GV023299@moth.iki.fi> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 737 Lines: 18 From: Markku Savela Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:45:03 +0200 > I think that is worse than allow a new driver to provide a simple > service function which maps IPv4/6 multicast address into link layer > address, when asked. The problem is that this mapping isn't so simple for several link layer types. I outlined in another email this problem, in that any interface which would allow a driver-like-API for this would be either overly general or so specific as to be useless. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/