Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp2273436pxp; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:33:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCindsYuDd11PYA3TMoVFIRv3n32nfK3S0haeLbSisB3Eqs4GL6KYJOOI5rbHGdXG1Gxia X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7287:b0:153:ce9:d629 with SMTP id d7-20020a170902728700b001530ce9d629mr15330906pll.25.1647902035623; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:33:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1647902035; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wHu6a800L+VpL5mnEL7HQl7qBtCsDr3PowbpB++hpfbLKAIqUNDT6PtZrPC+pX405n XfnDqhFPXHEponkVerggGEqyLxr7X/kUdDzRC8Hvv+NDFJnmsuscUoZVtk0KkzweIh78 EFKonqLqmvIGq2qkS0Gyz95Y+7brZ9AEQMbKVXefRsqPBCK+uWKJ+i5yYVu/5PaOHFPc /4I7rIHLFIlXZh5vLCV3a1ajSdYKiIboSZPekyN1ymXift54T0KR0bsaqkd8coRazrt9 Md+PcyqL94K8E+DCLgLjltBT2h4JW9euXpdkzGbze0y5u+JuYFwzfWVZQl+s6OkI34aj WmCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=YWAkAEoHc3rDwpEyvwULZPLuFdjEsvNjERSIYNi27g0=; b=nmkECfHLitAD4PZAMe+RvXSuSF0JOZAvPxfaPWM7A6yqQPFJ2HGvpMB/JJcj66H7fj 7FFZlG3KByC39LF4zJkr0Ifc2yrWOXC2JUzxBPoxn0Tx6Y3MMsQ9PXefTKkph5hBepa1 brGp7+kvMxRcBO7DF7AfxBSskdIYMkIyL8eUVpjZMsJ8fETEVX35lfi4HLyAQ8oumerM bXtIJICRmrbivlwa626UXB5kXjzctQOAhz2w1wmmORsLwq6QNhZdwZ5xtQD0VSo9i/+/ KLTLqCfOKxr8g0657WGReUwjulndceg1gWoeywsFVXOJ9LSpHImgBnTiFbXIFTaSpK87 T+3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b="gwjQS8/v"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [2620:137:e000::1:18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j7-20020a17090276c700b00153b2d164ebsi10722228plt.243.2022.03.21.15.33.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b="gwjQS8/v"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18473D20B5; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:47:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345467AbiCUIvv (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 04:51:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53346 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344531AbiCUIvu (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 04:51:50 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403353669A; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 01:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C340861158; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87298C340E8; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:50:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1647852625; bh=BILM29Vz9Uzyjt1P4yCjGxvGQNz4xIpQPbvuVj+CJNY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gwjQS8/v7pxCCz6xYSKlbvTQ3ICRioXfWlF/cJwei6zLWr9YqnBT3aAgF3VI/SwF2 kJG/ZDezwlHYjr0BXKKuMb6mRaRw+E96xndf4QZfxpydbnxA7wTw48y7nr9MY/nOrs jFvPksMrvWZdqPuKu7IYs49e7qiL4epo2X23nJcA= Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:50:21 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Carlos Llamas , Alessio Balsini , Masahiro Yamada , Arnd Bergmann , kernel-team , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: fix integer type usage in uapi header Message-ID: References: <20220318171405.2728855-1-cmllamas@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 09:40:56AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 03:07, Carlos Llamas wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 08:24:55PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 18:14, Carlos Llamas wrote: > > > > > > > > Kernel uapi headers are supposed to use __[us]{8,16,32,64} defined by > > > > instead of 'uint32_t' and similar. This patch changes > > > > all the definitions in this header to use the correct type. Previous > > > > discussion of this topic can be found here: > > > > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/5/18 > > > > > > This is effectively a revert of these two commits: > > > > > > 4c82456eeb4d ("fuse: fix type definitions in uapi header") > > > 7e98d53086d1 ("Synchronize fuse header with one used in library") > > > > > > And so we've gone full circle and back to having to modify the header > > > to be usable in the cross platform library... > > > > > > And also made lots of churn for what reason exactly? > > > > There are currently only two uapi headers making use of C99 types and > > one is . This approach results in different typedefs being > > selected when compiling for userspace vs the kernel. > > Why is this a problem if the size of the resulting types is the same? uint* are not "valid" variable types to cross the user/kernel boundary. They are part of the userspace variable type namespace, not the kernel variable type namespace. Linus wrong a long post about this somewhere in the past, I'm sure someone can dig it up... thanks, greg k-h